Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38850377›Full record

ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2024

Reliability and validity of surface EMG assessments combined with isometric muscle strength testing in patients with abdominal rectus diastasis and asymptomatic controls.

E Swedenhammar, O Wahlström, J D Brandt, K Strigård, C Häger, B Stark, A Nyberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

E Swedenhammar *Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. ebba.swedenhammar@ki.se.ORCID 0000-0001-9189-9725
O Wahlström *Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
J D BrandtDepartment of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-3463-1911
K StrigårdDepartment of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences. Units: Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-5838-9133
C HägerDepartment of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-0366-4609
B StarkDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-7112-0718
A NybergDepartment of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-2782-7959

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePatients with abdominal rectus diastasis (ARD) may have muscular functional impairments, but clinics lack appropriate objective assessment tools. The aim was to establish the relative and absolute reliability, and convergent validity, of muscular activity using Surface Electromyography (SEMG) during isometric abdominal muscle strength testing in patients with ARD and controls without ARD.

methodsTwenty-six patients with ARD were matched for age, sex and BMI with controls without ARD. Participants were tested twice during isometric muscular contractions using SEMG located on six abdominal sites. Mean amplitude, fatigue, and recruitment order were analyzed. Relative reliability was evaluated with Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC), while absolute reliability was estimated by calculating the Standard Error of Measurement and Minimal Detectable Change. Convergent validity was addressed in relation to participant characteristics, functional ability, and symptoms.

resultsMean SEMG amplitude for all abdominal wall muscle contractions showed moderate to excellent relative test-retest reliability, with ICC values ranging from 0.46 to 0.97. In contrast, fatigue and recruitment order displayed poor to moderate relative reliability in both groups. Absolute reliability measures were generally high. A moderate to high convergent validity (ARD: rho-value 0.41-0.70; Controls: rho-value 0.41-0.75) was observed for mean amplitude in relation to a functional sit-to-stand test, abdominal circumference, BMI, back pain, and quality-of-life.

conclusionsThe results of applying SEMG during isometric abdominal muscle support practicing the method in clinics, although additional development is needed with further standardization and more functional testing. Furthermore, the method demonstrates construct validity in patients with ARD and in age- and sex-matched controls.

Indexed as

ElectromyographyIsometric ContractionMuscle StrengthRectus AbdominisAdultCase-Control StudiesDiastasis, MuscleFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsAbdominal rectus diastasisClinical investigationCorrelationReliabilitySurface EMG

Identifiers

PMID38850377
PMCPMC11297106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.