ArticleNeurogenetics2024
Investigation of genotype-phenotype and familial features of Turkish dystrophinopathy patients.
Article in Neurogenetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) and Becker muscular dystrophy (BMD) are X-linked recessive allelic muscle diseases caused by dystrophin gene mutations. Eight hundred thirty-seven patients admitted between 1997 and 2022 were included in the study. Two hundred twenty patients were analyzed by multiplex PCR (mPCR) alone. Five hundred ninety-five patients were investigated by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA), and 54 patients were examined by sequencing. Deletion was detected in 60% (132/220) of the cases in the mPCR group only and in 58.3% (347/595) of the cases with MLPA analysis. The rates of deletion and duplication were 87.7% and 12.3%, respectively, in the MLPA analysis. Single exon deletions were the most common mutation type. The introns 43-55 (81.8%) and exons 2-21 (13.1%) regions were detected as hot spots in deletions. It was determined that 89% of the mutations were suitable for exon skipping therapy. The reading frame rule did not hold in 7.6% of D/BMD cases (17/224). We detected twenty-five pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in sequencing, five of which were novel variants. Nonsense mutation was the most common small mutation (44%). 21% of DMD patients were familial. We detected germline mosaicism in four families (4.3%) in the large rearrangement group and one gonosomal mosaicism in a family with a nonsense mutation. This is the largest study examining genotype and phenotype data in Turkish D/BMD families investigated by MLPA analysis. The reading frame hypothesis is not valid in all cases. Sharing the genotype and phenotype characteristics of these cases in the literature will shed light on the molecular structure of DMD and guide gene therapy research. In genetic counseling, carrier screening in the family and possible gonadal mosaicism should be emphasized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38850354What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.