Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38850331›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2024

Development of the neonatal pain response variable set: a mixed methods consensus process.

Nanxi Zhu, Bingjie Long, Xinling Zhan, Lanxin Zhang, Zechuan Wang, Lianhong Wang, Yi Huang, Juan Chen, Chi Huang, Lu Xiong and 2 more

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Nanxi Zhu *Department of Nursing, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, China.
Bingjie Long *Department of Nursing, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, China.
Xinling ZhanDepartment of Nursing, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, China.
Lanxin ZhangDepartment of Nursing, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, China.
Zechuan WangDepartment of Nursing, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, China.
Lianhong WangDepartment of Nursing, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, China.
Yi HuangDepartment of Nursing, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, China. 245794952@qq.com.
Juan ChenDepartment of Neonatology, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, China.
Chi HuangDepartment of Neonatology, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, China.
Lu XiongDepartment of Neonatology, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, China.
Zhenyan FuDepartment of Neonatology, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, China.
Renli DengDepartment of Nursing, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, China. 690891192@qq.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While over 40 neonatal pain assessment scales have been published, owing to a lack of consensus and standardized metrics, there are more than 100 assessment indicators with varying descriptors and quality differences. This study aims to reach a consensus on optimal and comprehensive variables for neonatal pain assessment, leading to the development of a multidimensional neonatal pain response variable set. This study consisted of three phases: (1) A literature review was conducted to identify influencing factors and assessment indicators of neonatal pain response. (2) Panel meetings involving neonatal healthcare professionals evaluated and screened factors and indicators to develop an initial draft of the variable set. (3) Through two rounds of Delphi study achieved consensus, and determined the neonatal pain response variable set. Through a literature review and a panel meeting, the identified factors and indicators were categorized into contextual, physiological, and behavioral variables, forming an initial draft of the variable set. Sixteen professionals participated in two rounds of the Delphi study, with response rates exceeding 70%, and authority coefficients surpassing 0.7 in both rounds. The final iteration of the variable set includes 9 contextual variables, 2 physiological variables, and 5 behavioral variables.   Conclusion: Neonatal pain response variable set developed in this study is scientific, comprehensive, and multidimensional, aligning with the characteristics of neonatal pain response and clinically applicable. The inclusion of contextual variables enhances the ability to confront the complexity of clinical environments and individual differences. It can provide a practical and theoretical basis for clinical research on neonatal pain assessment. What is Known: • Neonatal pain assessment relies on scales used by healthcare professionals currently. But there is no "gold standard" for neonatal pain assessment. • While over 40 neonatal pain assessment scales have been published, owing to a lack of consensus and standardized metrics, there are more than 100 assessment indicators with varying descriptors and quality differences. Most of scales overlook the clinical environment complexity individual differences in pain responses, diminishing the accuracy and applicability. What is New: • In addition to the commonly used physiological and behavioral variables in the scales, we have incorporated contextual variables to better address the complexity of clinical environments and individual differences in pain responses. • Through an evidence-based approach, developed a neonatal pain response variable set comprising 9 contextual variables, 2 physiological variables, and 5 behavioral variables.

Indexed as

ConsensusDelphi TechniquePain MeasurementHumansInfant, NewbornPainAssessment IndicatorInfluencing factorNeonateNursing assessmentPain

Identifiers

PMID38850331
PMCPMC11322254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.