ArticleJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2024
Precise risk-prediction model including arterial stiffness for new-onset atrial fibrillation using machine learning techniques.
Article in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Single nucleus transcriptomics reveals ITGA8-driven fibroblast remodeling in rheumatic valvular atrial fibrillation.iScience · 2026Article
- Integrating AI-Driven Diagnostics in Arrhythmia Care to Enhance Patient Outcomes: A Narrative Review.Cureus · 2026Review
- Precise risk-prediction model including arterial stiffness for new-onset atrial fibrillation using machine learning techniques.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common clinically significant cardiac arrhythmia and is an important risk factor for ischemic cerebrovascular events. This study used machine learning techniques to develop and validate a new risk prediction model for new-onset AF that incorporated the use electrocardiogram to diagnose AF, data from participants with a wide age range, and considered hypertension and measures of atrial stiffness. In Japan, Industrial Safety and Health Law requires employers to provide annual health check-ups to their employees. This study included 13 410 individuals who underwent health check-ups on at least four successive years between 2005 and 2015 (new-onset AF, n = 110; non-AF, n = 13 300). Data were entered into a risk prediction model using machine learning methods (eXtreme Gradient Boosting and Shapley Additive Explanation values). Data were randomly split into a training set (80%) used for model construction and development, and a test set (20%) used to test performance of the derived model. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve for the model in the test set was 0.789. The best predictor of new-onset AF was age, followed by the cardio-ankle vascular index, estimated glomerular filtration rate, sex, body mass index, uric acid, γ-glutamyl transpeptidase level, triglycerides, systolic blood pressure at cardio-ankle vascular index measurement, and alanine aminotransferase level. This new model including arterial stiffness measure, developed with data from a general population using machine learning methods, could be used to identify at-risk individuals and potentially facilitation the prevention of future AF development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.