ReviewInternational journal for equity in health2024
Perspectives on the essential skills of healthcare decision making in children and adolescents with intellectual disability.
Review in International journal for equity in health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Models of Healthcare for People With Intellectual Disability in Australia: A Scoping Review.Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR · 2026Article
- Effects of Non-Pharmacological Interventions on Motor Function in Children and Adolescents With Intellectual Disability: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2026Article
- Knowledge, Attitudes, and Perceptions of HPV Vaccination for Adolescents with Intellectual Disabilities: A Systematic Review.Vaccines · 2026Review
- Investigating Cancer literacy and help-seeking barriers among individuals with intellectual disabilities in Hungary.Preventive medicine reports · 2026Article
- Applying adaptive research methods to explore health literacy in young people with intellectual disability.Health promotion international · 2026Article
- Access to choice‑enabled healthcare providers among children and adults with intellectual disabilities in comparison with the general population (IDcare).BMC health services research · 2026Article
- "What's in It for the Kid?": An Approach for the Bedside Ethicist.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- "It was up to me to be curious": perceptions and experiences of students with intellectual disability on genetics and health education.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- Relational autonomy in pediatric healthcare: A scoping review.Nursing ethics · 2026Review
- A Scoping Review and Content Analysis of Available Chronic Pain Education Programs and Resources for Children, Adolescents and Young Adults with Diverse Abilities.Journal of pain research · 2026Review
- Experiences with shared decision-making in psychotropic medication for people with intellectual disabilities: perspectives of experts by experience, relatives, and support professionals.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Mechanical ventilation for young people with Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a factorial survey of the main influences on clinician decision-making.European journal of pediatrics · 2025Article
- Health From the Perspective of Adolescents With Intellectual Disabilities-Report From Poland.Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID · 2025Article
- Healthcare professionals face ethical challenges in managing care for neurodevelopmental disorders: a qualitative study in Lebanon.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Understanding parents' experiences and needs when managing menstruation with young people with intellectual disability.Women's health (London, England)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundInvolvement in healthcare decisions is associated with better health outcomes for patients. For children and adolescents with intellectual disability, parents and healthcare professionals need to balance listening to a child's wishes with the responsibility of keeping them safe. However, there is a scarcity of literature evaluating how to effectively involve them in decision making. In this context, we review the concept of health literacy, focusing on the skills of healthcare decision making for children and adolescents with intellectual disability.
methodsWe describe the concept of health literacy and models explaining shared decision making (individuals and healthcare professionals collaborate in decision making process) and supported decision making (when a trusted person supports the individual to collaborate with the healthcare professional in the decision-making process), and a rapid review of the literature evaluating their efficacy. We discuss healthcare decision making for children and adolescents with intellectual disability in the context of relevant recommendations from the recent Disability Royal Commission into Violence, Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation of People with Disability in Australia.
resultsHealth literacy skills enable individuals to access, understand, appraise, remember and use health information and services. Shared decision making has been described for children with chronic conditions and supported decision making for adults with intellectual disability. Decision-making contributes to how individuals appraise and use healthcare. The rapid review found very limited evidence of outcomes where children and adolescents with intellectual disability have been supported to contribute to their healthcare decisions. Recommendations from the Disability Royal Commission highlight current needs for greater efforts to support and build the capacity of individuals with disability to be involved in the decisions that affect their life, including healthcare decision making.
conclusionsExisting rights frameworks and healthcare standards confirm the importance of providing all people with the opportunities to learn and practise health literacy skills including decision making. There is little literature examining interventions for healthcare decision making for children with intellectual disability. Childhood is a critical time for the development of skills and autonomy. Evidence for how children and adolescents with intellectual disability can learn and practice healthcare decision-making skills in preparation for adulthood is needed to reduce inequities in their autonomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.