Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38849806›Full record

ReviewInternational journal for equity in health2024

Perspectives on the essential skills of healthcare decision making in children and adolescents with intellectual disability.

Jenny Downs, Jessica Keeley, Rachel Skoss, Jaquie Mills, Thom Nevill, Alice Schippers, Olivia Lindly, Sandra Thompson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal for equity in health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Health From the Perspective of Adolescents With Intellectual Disabilities-Report From Poland.Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jenny DownsCentre for Child Health Research, Telethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia. Jenny.Downs@telethonkids.org.au.
Jessica KeeleyCentre for Child Health Research, Telethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
Rachel SkossCentre for Child Health Research, Telethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
Jaquie MillsMicroboards Australia, Perth, Australia.
Thom NevillCentre for Child Health Research, Telethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
Alice SchippersDisability Studies, Department of Care Ethics, University of Humanistic Studies, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Olivia LindlyDepartment of Health Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA.
Sandra ThompsonWestern Australian Centre for Rural Health, University of Western Australia, Geraldton, Australia.

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council 2015902Stan Perron Charitable Foundation n/a
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInvolvement in healthcare decisions is associated with better health outcomes for patients. For children and adolescents with intellectual disability, parents and healthcare professionals need to balance listening to a child's wishes with the responsibility of keeping them safe. However, there is a scarcity of literature evaluating how to effectively involve them in decision making. In this context, we review the concept of health literacy, focusing on the skills of healthcare decision making for children and adolescents with intellectual disability.

methodsWe describe the concept of health literacy and models explaining shared decision making (individuals and healthcare professionals collaborate in decision making process) and supported decision making (when a trusted person supports the individual to collaborate with the healthcare professional in the decision-making process), and a rapid review of the literature evaluating their efficacy. We discuss healthcare decision making for children and adolescents with intellectual disability in the context of relevant recommendations from the recent Disability Royal Commission into Violence, Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation of People with Disability in Australia.

resultsHealth literacy skills enable individuals to access, understand, appraise, remember and use health information and services. Shared decision making has been described for children with chronic conditions and supported decision making for adults with intellectual disability. Decision-making contributes to how individuals appraise and use healthcare. The rapid review found very limited evidence of outcomes where children and adolescents with intellectual disability have been supported to contribute to their healthcare decisions. Recommendations from the Disability Royal Commission highlight current needs for greater efforts to support and build the capacity of individuals with disability to be involved in the decisions that affect their life, including healthcare decision making.

conclusionsExisting rights frameworks and healthcare standards confirm the importance of providing all people with the opportunities to learn and practise health literacy skills including decision making. There is little literature examining interventions for healthcare decision making for children with intellectual disability. Childhood is a critical time for the development of skills and autonomy. Evidence for how children and adolescents with intellectual disability can learn and practice healthcare decision-making skills in preparation for adulthood is needed to reduce inequities in their autonomy.

Indexed as

Decision MakingHealth LiteracyIntellectual DisabilityAdolescentAustraliaChildDecision Making, SharedHumansPatient ParticipationDisability Royal CommissionHealth literacyIntellectual disabilityShared decision makingSupported decision making

Identifiers

PMID38849806
PMCPMC11162048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.