ReviewDrugs2024
Anti-IL-5 Pathway Agents in Eosinophilic-Associated Disorders Across the Lifespan.
Review in Drugs, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Safety and efficacy of anti-IL-5 monoclonal antibodies as second-line therapy for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Predictive biomarkers of biologic therapy response in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: a systematic review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Depemokimab: A twice yearly anti-IL 5 biologic for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) - A narrative review.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026Review
- Indications for Biological Treatment Combined with Allergen-Specific Immunotherapy: Who Is It Really Intended for?Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Targeting Type 2 and Non-type 2 Asthma: Emerging Biologics and Personalized Strategies.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2026Review
- Trends of T2 and Non-T2 Cytokines During Mepolizumab Treatment in Different Asthma Patient Subgroups.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Age-specific efficacy of biologics in severe asthma: a pediatric perspective.Frontiers in allergy · 2026Review
- Eosinophilic Depletion with Benralizumab, Mepolizumab, and Depemokimab: A Modeling Study.Journal of asthma and allergy · 2026Article
- Pro-inflammatory and counter-regulatory modulators of interleukin-5-driven eosinophil programs: a framework for precision medicine in eosinophilic diseases.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Biological functions and clinical efficacy of IL-5/IL-5Rα-targeted therapies across eosinophilia-associated diseases.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- The Therapeutic Pipeline for Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Current Landscape and Future Directions.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Recent Developments in Monoclonal-Antibody-Based Biologic Therapy for Severe Refractory Eosinophilic Asthma.Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Hypereosinophilia: clinical and therapeutic approach in 2025.Current opinion in allergy and clinical immunology · 2025Review
- Targeted Biologic Therapies in Severe Asthma: Mechanisms, Biomarkers, and Clinical Applications.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Update on Acute Tubulointerstitial Nephritis: Clinical Features, Immunologic Insights, and Diagnostic and Treatment Approaches.Kidney international reports · 2025Review
- Comparative Insights on IL-5 Targeting with Mepolizumab and Benralizumab: Enhancing EGPA Treatment Strategies.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Clinical and Pathophysiological Tangles Between Allergy and Autoimmunity: Deconstructing an Old Dichotomic Paradigm.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2025Review
- Exploring dupilumab for asthma: from mechanistic insights to clinical outcomes, safety, and cost-effectiveness.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Eosinophilia withTurkish journal of haematology : official journal of Turkish Society of Haematology · 2024Article
- Sinonasal Outcomes Obtained after 2 Years of Treatment with Benralizumab in Patients with Severe Eosinophilic Asthma and CRSwNP: A "Real-Life" Observational Study.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Monoclonal antibodies targeting interleukin (IL)-5 pathways have revolutionized the treatment expectations for eosinophilic-associated conditions, particularly in patients with respiratory involvement. Mepolizumab (IL-5 antagonist monoclonal antibody), benralizumab (IL-5 receptor blocker monoclonal antibody), and reslizumab (IL-5 antagonist monoclonal antibody) have collectively contributed to the overall improvement of the disease burden in various conditions. Eosinophilic asthma currently boasts the most robust evidence across all age groups: all three biologics are approved for adults (aged ≥18 years); mepolizumab is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) also in children (aged ≥ 6 years), while bernalizumab was recently approved by the FDA for patients aged ≥6 years in the USA. In chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, subcutaneous mepolizumab is the only anti-IL-5 therapy approved so far and can be used in adult patients (aged ≥18 years). For eosinophilic esophagitis, conflicting evidence surrounds both mepolizumab, reslizumab, and benralizumab, leading to non-approval of these agents by the FDA/EMA. Recently, mepolizumab was approved for eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis patients aged ≥6 years or older and for hypereosinophilic syndrome adult patients. A phase III trial proving noninferiority of benralizumab versus mepolizumab in eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis has been recently published, while evidence on reslizumab is scant. Overall, current evidence on anti-IL-5 biologics for eosinophilic-associated disorders is mostly focused on adults, whereas data for individuals aged under 18 years and over 65 years are scarce, resulting in a lack of evidence, particularly regarding efficacy, for the use of anti-IL-5 agents in these specific patient populations. This review addresses high-quality evidence from randomized controlled trials and real-world post-marketing studies regarding the use of anti-IL-5 therapies for eosinophilic-associated disorders across all age groups, spanning childhood, adulthood, and older age.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.