Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38849662›Full record

ReviewEuropean radiology2024

ESR Essentials: characterisation and staging of adnexal masses with MRI and CT-practice recommendations by ESUR.

Giacomo Avesani, Camilla Panico, Stephanie Nougaret, Ramona Woitek, Benedetta Gui, Evis Sala

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. CT-based radiomics model to predict platinum sensitivity in epithelial ovarian carcinoma: a multicentre study.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Giacomo Avesani *Department of Imaging and Radiotherapy, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy. giacomo.avesani@policlinicogemelli.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9926-760X
Camilla Panico *Department of Imaging and Radiotherapy, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Stephanie NougaretDepartment of Radiology, PINKCC Lab, IRCM INSERM, SIRIC, Montpellier, France.
Ramona WoitekResearch Centre for Medical Image Analysis and Artificial Intelligence, Danube Private University, Krems, Austria.
Benedetta GuiDepartment of Imaging and Radiotherapy, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Evis SalaDepartment of Imaging and Radiotherapy, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ovarian masses encompass various conditions, from benign to highly malignant, and imaging plays a vital role in their diagnosis and management. Ultrasound, particularly transvaginal ultrasound, is the foremost diagnostic method for adnexal masses. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is advised for more precise characterisation if ultrasound results are inconclusive. The ovarian-adnexal reporting and data system (O-RADS) MRI lexicon and scoring system provides a standardised method for describing, assessing, and categorising the risk of each ovarian mass. Determining a histological differential diagnosis of the mass may influence treatment decision-making and treatment planning. When ultrasound or MRI suggests the possibility of cancer, computed tomography (CT) is the preferred imaging technique for staging. It is essential to outline the extent of the malignancy, guide treatment decisions, and evaluate the feasibility of cytoreductive surgery. This article provides a comprehensive overview of the key imaging processes in evaluating and managing ovarian masses, from initial diagnosis to initial treatment. It also includes pertinent recommendations for properly performing and interpreting various imaging modalities. KEY POINTS: MRI is the modality of choice for indeterminate ovarian masses at ultrasound, and the O-RADS MRI lexicon and score enable unequivocal communication with clinicians. CT is the recommended modality for suspected ovarian masses to tailor treatment and surgery. Multidisciplinary meetings integrate information and help decide the most appropriate treatment for each patient.

Indexed as

Adnexal DiseasesMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeoplasm StagingOvarian NeoplasmsTomography, X-Ray ComputedDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansPractice Guidelines as TopicSocieties, MedicalUltrasonographyMagnetic resonance imagingOvarian neoplasmsPatient careWorkflowX-ray computed tomography

Identifiers

PMID38849662
PMCPMC11557651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.