Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38849657›Full record

ArticleActa diabetologica2024

Incidence and sex differences of diabetes among youth: a 50-year population-based cohort study.

Patricia Bai, Andrew J Barkmeier, David O Hodge, Brian G Mohney

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Acta diabetologica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Patricia BaiAlix School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Andrew J BarkmeierDepartment of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street Southwest, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
David O HodgeDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Brian G MohneyDepartment of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street Southwest, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. mohney@mayo.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7678-8090

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsAlthough the literature on childhood diabetes has traditionally focused on Type 1 diabetes (T1D), youth-onset Type 2 diabetes (T2D) and its associated morbidities have become increasingly prevalent. This study reports on the incidence and demographics of a population-based cohort of children diagnosed with diabetes over a 50-year period.

methodsMedical records of patients < 22 years diagnosed with diabetes from January 1, 1970, through December 31, 2019, were retrospectively reviewed using the Rochester Epidemiology Project, a database of clinics and hospitals in Olmsted County, Minnesota.

resultsOf 606 children diagnosed with diabetes, 519 (85.6%) were diagnosed with T1D at a mean age of 10.9 ± 5.3 years. 87 (14.4%) were diagnosed with T2D at a mean age of 17.4 ± 3.4 years. The incidence of T2D increased 23-fold (p < 0.001) over the five-decade period (5 per 100,000 children/year) while T1D remained stable (26 per 100,000 children/year; p = 0.08). The mean body mass index at T2D diagnosis (35.5 kg/m

conclusionsThe incidence of youth-onset T2D increased significantly over the 50-year period while the incidence of T1D remained stable. A higher proportion of females were diagnosed with youth-onset T2D. Females with T2D were more than six times likelier to develop diabetic retinopathy than males.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2AdolescentAge of OnsetBody Mass IndexChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMinnesotaRetrospective StudiesSex FactorsYoung AdultIncidence of diabetesRetrospectiveType 2 diabetesYouth onset diabetes

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.