ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2024
Deep learning automatic semantic segmentation of glioblastoma multiforme regions on multimodal magnetic resonance images.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- PET|MR Open Source Radiomics Models for Treatment Outcome Prediction in Recurrent GBM.Cancers · 2026Article
- Deep Learning Auto-segmentation of Diffuse Midline Glioma on Multimodal Magnetic Resonance Images.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Deep Neural Network-Based Risk Prediction of Glioblastoma Multiforme Recurrence.Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN · 2025Article
- Enhanced glioma semantic segmentation using U-net and pre-trained backbone U-net architectures.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A Review on Deep Learning Methods for Glioma Segmentation, Limitations, and Future Perspectives.Journal of imaging · 2025Review
- The Evolving Landscape of Radiomics in Gliomas: Insights into Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Research Trends.Cancers · 2025Review
- GlioMODA: Robust glioma segmentation in clinical routine.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesIn patients having naïve glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), this study aims to assess the efficacy of Deep Learning algorithms in automating the segmentation of brain magnetic resonance (MR) images to accurately determine 3D masks for 4 distinct regions: enhanced tumor, peritumoral edema, non-enhanced/necrotic tumor, and total tumor. MATERIAL AND
methodsA 3D U-Net neural network algorithm was developed for semantic segmentation of GBM. The training dataset was manually delineated by a group of expert neuroradiologists on MR images from the Brain Tumor Segmentation Challenge 2021 (BraTS2021) image repository, as ground truth labels for diverse glioma (GBM and low-grade glioma) subregions across four MR sequences (T1w, T1w-contrast enhanced, T2w, and FLAIR) in 1251 patients. The in-house test was performed on 50 GBM patients from our cohort (PerProGlio project). By exploring various hyperparameters, the network's performance was optimized, and the most optimal parameter configuration was identified. The assessment of the optimized network's performance utilized Dice scores, precision, and sensitivity metrics.
resultsOur adaptation of the 3D U-net with additional residual blocks demonstrated reliable performance on both the BraTS2021 dataset and the in-house PerProGlio cohort, employing only T1w-ce sequences for enhancement and non-enhanced/necrotic tumor models and T1w-ce + T2w + FLAIR for peritumoral edema and total tumor. The mean Dice scores (training and test) were 0.89 and 0.75; 0.75 and 0.64; 0.79 and 0.71; and 0.60 and 0.55, for total tumor, edema, enhanced tumor, and non-enhanced/necrotic tumor, respectively.
conclusionsThe results underscore the high precision with which our network can effectively segment GBM tumors and their distinct subregions. The level of accuracy achieved agrees with the coefficients recorded in previous GBM studies. In particular, our approach allows model specialization for each of the different tumor subregions employing only those MR sequences that provide value for segmentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38849632What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.