Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38849631›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2025

Beyond the visible: preliminary evaluation of the first wearable augmented reality assistance system for pancreatic surgery.

Hamraz Javaheri, Omid Ghamarnejad, Ragnar Bade, Paul Lukowicz, Jakob Karolus, Gregor Alexander Stavrou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. 3D Modelling for Preoperative Planning, Intraoperative Navigation, and Training in Pancreatic Surgery: A Systematic Review.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Enhancing Perioperative Outcomes of Pancreatic Surgery with Wearable Augmented Reality Assistance System: A Matched-Pair Analysis.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hamraz JavaheriGerman Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI), Kaiserslautern, Germany.
Omid GhamarnejadDepartment of General, Visceral, and Oncological Surgery, Klinikum Saarbrücken, Winterberg 1, 66119, Saarbrücken, Germany.
Ragnar BadeMeVis Medical Solutions AG, Bremen, Germany.
Paul LukowiczGerman Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI), Kaiserslautern, Germany.
Jakob KarolusGerman Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI), Kaiserslautern, Germany. jakob.karolus@rhrk.uni-kl.de.
Gregor Alexander StavrouDepartment of General, Visceral, and Oncological Surgery, Klinikum Saarbrücken, Winterberg 1, 66119, Saarbrücken, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6890-4271

Funding

H2020 European Research Council 952026
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe retroperitoneal nature of the pancreas, marked by minimal intraoperative organ shifts and deformations, makes augmented reality (AR)-based systems highly promising for pancreatic surgery. This study presents preliminary data from a prospective study aiming to develop the first wearable AR assistance system, ARAS, for pancreatic surgery and evaluating its usability, accuracy, and effectiveness in enhancing the perioperative outcomes of patients.

methodsWe developed ARAS as a two-phase system for a wearable AR device to aid surgeons in planning and operation. This system was used to visualize and register patient-specific 3D anatomical models during the surgery. The location and precision of the registered 3D anatomy were evaluated by assessing the arterial pulse and employing Doppler and duplex ultrasonography. The usability, accuracy, and effectiveness of ARAS were assessed using a five-point Likert scale questionnaire.

resultsPerioperative outcomes of five patients underwent various pancreatic resections with ARAS are presented. Surgeons rated ARAS as excellent for preoperative planning. All structures were accurately identified without any noteworthy errors. Only tumor identification decreased after the preparation phase, especially in patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy because of the extensive mobilization of peripancreatic structures. No perioperative complications related to ARAS were observed.

conclusionsARAS shows promise in enhancing surgical precision during pancreatic procedures. Its efficacy in preoperative planning and intraoperative vascular identification positions it as a valuable tool for pancreatic surgery and a potential educational resource for future surgical residents.

Indexed as

Augmented RealityPancreasPancreatic NeoplasmsSurgery, Computer-AssistedWearable Electronic DevicesAgedFemaleHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMaleMiddle AgedPancreaticoduodenectomyProspective StudiesAugmented realityNavigation systemPancreatectomySurgical planningWearable devices

Identifiers

PMID38849631
PMCPMC11757645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.