ReviewEye (London, England)2024
Nerve fibre organisation in the human optic nerve and chiasm: what do we really know?
Review in Eye (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Structure-function correlates in anterior visual pathway lesions: a systematic review.Eye (London, England) · 2025Pooled it
- The role of optical coherence tomography in the evaluation of para-chiasmal lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in ophthalmology · 2025Pooled it
- A biophysical model linking cortical scalar potentials and polarization waves to slow traveling activity in vision.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A Cerebral Origin for Retinal Degeneration in the Visual Form of Alzheimer's Disease?The European journal of neuroscience · 2025Article
- Non-human primates as preclinical models for optic nerve research: advancing insights into their application and potential.Eye (London, England) · 2025Review
- Cortical white matter: no longer a silent partner.Frontiers in neuroanatomy · 2025Review
- Optical coherence tomography and electroretinography in pituitary macroadenomas: a 12-month analysis by age and tumor type.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Observational
- Neuro-ophthalmology: recent advances and paradigm shifts.Eye (London, England) · 2024Article
- Retinal nerve fibre layer thickness reflects characteristics of brain grey and white matter.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A recent anatomical study of the human optic chiasm cast doubt on the widespread assumption that nerve fibres travelling in the human optic nerve and chiasm are arranged retinotopically. Accordingly, a scoping literature review was performed to determine what is known about the nerve fibre arrangement in these structures. Meta-analysis suggested that the average number of fibres in each optic nerve was 1.023 million with an inter-individual range of approximately 50% of the mean. Loss of nerve fibres with age (approximately 3,400 fibres/year) could not account for this variability. The review suggested that there might be a retinotopic arrangement of nerve fibres in the orbital portion of the optic nerve but that this arrangement is most likely to be lost posteriorly with a more random distribution of nerve fibres at the chiasm. Limited studies have looked at nerve fibre arrangement in the chiasm. In summary, the chiasm is more 'H-shaped' than 'X-shaped': nerve fibre crossings occur paracentrally with nerves in the centre of the chiasm travelling coronally and in parallel. There is interaction between crossed and uncrossed fibres which are widely distributed. The review supports the non-existence of Wilbrand's knee. Considerable further work is required to provide more precise anatomical information, but this review suggests that the assumed preservation of retinotopy in the human optic nerve and chiasm is probably not correct.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.