ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2024
An ultrasound based method for predicting the malignant potential of primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors preoperatively.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Application value of gastric contrast ultrasonography in gastric tumors.Insights into imaging · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveGastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are difficult to identify the risk level accurately without surgical pathological confirmation. The purpose of our study was to propose a noninvasive prediction method for predicting the malignant potential of GISTs preoperatively by using contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) with gastric distention.
methodsWe reviewed 47 GISTs who underwent CEUS from April 2017 to August 2023 retrospectively, all the lesions were certificated by pathology after surgery. The age of the patient, size of the lesion, shape, necrosis, calcification in the lesion, perfusion parameters including arrival time (AT), peak intensity (PI), time to peak (TTP), and area under the curve (AUC) of the lesion and surrounding normal tissue were analyzed. Logistic regression analyses were performed. Of the 47 GISTs, 26 were high-risk and 21 low-risk tumors respectively.
resultsCompared with low-risk GISTs, high-risk GIST had faster AT (7.7s vs. 11.5s, p < 0.05), higher PI (15.2dB vs. 12.5dB, p < 0.05), and larger size (4.4 cm vs. 2.2 cm, p < 0.001). In multivariate logistic regression, AT, PI, and size were significant features. The corresponding regression equation In (p/(1-p)=-5.9 + 4.5 size + 4.6 PI + 4.0 AT).
conclusionThe size, AT, and PI of the GISTs on CEUS can be used as parameters for a noninvasive risk level prediction model of GISTs. This model may help identify the different risk levels of GISTs before surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38849537What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.