Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38849483›Full record

SynthesisPediatric research2025

Methods of identifying surgical Necrotizing Enterocolitis-a systematic review and meta-analysis.

George S Bethell, Ian H Jones, Cheryl Battersby, Marian Knight, Nigel J Hall

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Pediatric research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Surgical Interventions for NEC-An Overview.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Necrotizing enterocolitis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. [Recent advances in predicting the surgical timing for neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Surgeons and neonatologists views about surgical decision-making in necrotising enterocolitis.Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

George S BethellUniversity Surgical Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Ian H JonesDepartment of Paediatric Surgery and Urology, Birmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
Cheryl BattersbyNeonatal Medicine, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Marian KnightNuffield Department of Population Health, National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Nigel J HallUniversity Surgical Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK. n.j.hall@soton.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent data suggests potential benefit of earlier surgery for necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) however this requires accurate prognostication early in the disease course. This study aims to identify and determine the effectiveness of previously reported methods or tests for the identification of surgical NEC.

methodsSystematic review and meta-analysis with registration on PROSPERO including articles describing a method of identifying surgical NEC. Outcomes of interest were effectiveness and repeatability of index test.

resultsOf the 190 full-text articles screened, 90 studies were included which contained 114 methods of identifying surgical NEC in 9546 infants. Of these methods, 44 were a scoring system, 37 a single biomarker, 24 an imaging method, and 9 an invasive method. Sensitivity and specificity ranged from 12.8-100% to 13-100%, respectively. Some methods (9.6%) provided insufficient methods for repeatability within clinical practice or research. Meta-analyses were possible for only 2 methods, the metabolic derangement 7 score and abdominal ultrasound.

conclusionsA range of methods for identifying surgical NEC have been identified with varying overall performance and uncertainties about reproducibility and superiority of any method. External validation in large multicentre datasets should allow direct comparison of accuracy and prospective study should evaluate impact on clinical outcomes. IMPACT: Earlier identification of need for surgery in necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) has the potential to improve the unfavourable outcomes in this condition. As such, many methods have been developed and reported to allow earlier identification of surgical NEC. This study is the first synthesis of the literature which identifies previously reported methods and the effectiveness of these. Many methods, including scoring systems and biomarkers, appear effective for prognostication in NEC and external validation is now required in multicentre datasets prior to clinical utility.

Indexed as

Enterocolitis, NecrotizingBiomarkersHumansInfantInfant, NewbornPrognosisReproducibility of ResultsBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID38849483
PMCPMC11798840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.