Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38849427›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Estimation of the amount of pear pollen based on flowering stage detection using deep learning.

Keita Endo, Takefumi Hiraguri, Tomotaka Kimura, Hiroyuki Shimizu, Tomohito Shimada, Akane Shibasaki, Chisa Suzuki, Ryota Fujinuma, Yoshihiro Takemura

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Keita EndoNippon Institute of Technology, Saitama, 345-8501, Japan. keita_endo@ieee.org.
Takefumi HiraguriNippon Institute of Technology, Saitama, 345-8501, Japan.
Tomotaka KimuraFaculty of Science and Engineering, Doshisha University, Kyoto, 610-0321, Japan.
Hiroyuki ShimizuNippon Institute of Technology, Saitama, 345-8501, Japan.
Tomohito ShimadaSaitama Agricultural Technology Research Center, Saitama, 346-0037, Japan.
Akane ShibasakiSaitama Agriculture and Forestry Promotion Center, Saitama, 330-0074, Japan.
Chisa SuzukiSaitama Agricultural Technology Research Center, Saitama, 346-0037, Japan.
Ryota FujinumaDKK Co., Ltd., Tokyo, 100-0005, Japan.
Yoshihiro TakemuraFaculty of Agriculture, Tottori University, Tottori, 680-8550, Japan.

Funding

Bio-Oriented Technology Research Advancement Institution(BRAIN) JPJ011397
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pear pollination is performed by artificial pollination because the pollination rate through insect pollination is not stable. Pollen must be collected to secure sufficient pollen for artificial pollination. However, recently, collecting sufficient amounts of pollen in Japan has become difficult, resulting in increased imports from overseas. To solve this problem, improving the efficiency of pollen collection and strengthening the domestic supply and demand system is necessary. In this study, we proposed an Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based method to estimate the amount of pear pollen. The proposed method used a deep learning-based object detection algorithm, You Only Look Once (YOLO), to classify and detect flower shapes in five stages, from bud to flowering, and to estimate the pollen amount. In this study, the performance of the proposed method was discussed by analyzing the accuracy and error of classification for multiple flower varieties. Although this study only discussed the performance of estimating the amount of pollen collected, in the future, we aim to establish a technique for estimating the time of maximum pollen collection using the method proposed in this study.

Indexed as

Deep LearningFlowersPollenPollinationPyrusAlgorithms

Identifiers

PMID38849427
PMCPMC11161521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.