Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38849202›Full record

ArticleComparative medicine2024

Kidney/Aorta Ratio for Renal Morphometric Determination in Swine Subjected to Acute Kidney Injury Using an Optimized Surgical Model.

Dayseanny de Oliveira Bezerra, Giuliano Amorim Aita, Charlys Rhands Coelho de Moura, Lucilene Dos Santos Silva, Camila Ernanda Sousa de Carvalho, Catarina Rafaela Alves da Silva, Marina Rebeca Soares Carneiro de Sousa, José Cláudio Barros Ferraz, Felipe Cardoso de Brito, Marina Silva Carvalho and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Comparative medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Dayseanny de Oliveira BezerraNúcleo Integrado e Morfologia e Pesquisas com Células-tronco (NUPCelt), Centro de Ciências Agrárias, Universidade Federal do Piauí, Teresina, Brazil.
Giuliano Amorim AitaHospital Universitário, Universidade Federal do Piauí, Teresina, Brazil.
Charlys Rhands Coelho de MouraNúcleo Integrado e Morfologia e Pesquisas com Células-tronco (NUPCelt), Centro de Ciências Agrárias, Universidade Federal do Piauí, Teresina, Brazil.
Lucilene Dos Santos SilvaNúcleo Integrado e Morfologia e Pesquisas com Células-tronco (NUPCelt), Centro de Ciências Agrárias, Universidade Federal do Piauí, Teresina, Brazil.
Camila Ernanda Sousa de CarvalhoNúcleo Integrado e Morfologia e Pesquisas com Células-tronco (NUPCelt), Centro de Ciências Agrárias, Universidade Federal do Piauí, Teresina, Brazil.
Catarina Rafaela Alves da SilvaNúcleo Integrado e Morfologia e Pesquisas com Células-tronco (NUPCelt), Centro de Ciências Agrárias, Universidade Federal do Piauí, Teresina, Brazil.
Marina Rebeca Soares Carneiro de SousaNúcleo Integrado e Morfologia e Pesquisas com Células-tronco (NUPCelt), Centro de Ciências Agrárias, Universidade Federal do Piauí, Teresina, Brazil.
José Cláudio Barros FerrazInstituto Federal do Piauí, José de Freitas, Brazil.
Felipe Cardoso de BritoInstituto Federal do Piauí, José de Freitas, Brazil.
Marina Silva CarvalhoNúcleo Integrado e Morfologia e Pesquisas com Células-tronco (NUPCelt), Centro de Ciências Agrárias, Universidade Federal do Piauí, Teresina, Brazil.
Wanderson Gabriel Gomes de MeloNúcleo Integrado e Morfologia e Pesquisas com Células-tronco (NUPCelt), Centro de Ciências Agrárias, Universidade Federal do Piauí, Teresina, Brazil.
Camile Benício CampêloNúcleo Integrado e Morfologia e Pesquisas com Células-tronco (NUPCelt), Centro de Ciências Agrárias, Universidade Federal do Piauí, Teresina, Brazil.
Maria Acelina Martins de CarvalhoNúcleo Integrado e Morfologia e Pesquisas com Células-tronco (NUPCelt), Centro de Ciências Agrárias, Universidade Federal do Piauí, Teresina, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This research aims to establish an experimental surgical model for access to the renal pedicle and kidney and to determine renal length measurement via the kidney/aorta ratio (K/AO) using ultrasound. Fifteen swine underwent ventral median celiotomy with a supraumbilical transverse incision to access the right and left renal pedicles and induce renal ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRR). The kidneys were evaluated using ultrasonography to standardize renal length, aortic diameter, and the K/AO. Assessment was performed at 2 time points: 1 h before and 24 h after the surgery to induce IRR. Blood and urine samples were collected to assess renal function. Histologic evaluation of kidney fragments was also conducted. The proposed abdominal cavity access method proved to be highly efficient for exposing the right and left renal pedicles and inducing IRR. Serum levels of urea, creatinine, calcium, and phosphorus, as well as levels of the urinary protein/urinary creatinine ratio and urinary GGT, did not show significant differences. Acute kidney injury was confirmed through histopathology. The mean lengths of the right and left kidneys were 82.63 and 87.64 mm, respectively. The values of the right and left K/AO were 9.81 and 10.38, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the K/AO ratio before and after IRR. The proposed surgical model allowed surgical intervention on the renal pedicles without intra- or postoperative complications. Furthermore, the K/AO could be measured through ultrasonography, establishing a reference for healthy animals.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryDisease Models, AnimalKidneyReperfusion InjuryUltrasonographyAnimalsAortaFemaleSwine

Identifiers

PMID38849202
PMCPMC11373677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.