Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38848662›Full record

ArticleESMO open2024

Effectiveness of a comprehensive support program for families with parental cancer (Family-SCOUT): results of a multicenter non-randomized controlled trial.

A Petermann-Meyer, J P Panse, R Bremen, M Dohmen, B Drueke, F Geiser, B Haastert, L Heier, C Heuser, S Holsteg and 6 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Article in ESMO open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Psychological burden, quality of life, problems, and parental concerns of single mothers with cancer: a cross-sectional comparison.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Communication patterns in families affected by parental cancer from the healthy parents' perspective-process evaluation of the complex intervention Family-SCOUT.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

A Petermann-MeyerDepartment of Hematology, Oncology, Hemostaseology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Faculty of Medicine, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen; Center for Integrated Oncology, Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO(ABCD)). Electronic address: apetermann-meyer@ukaachen.de.
J P PanseDepartment of Hematology, Oncology, Hemostaseology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Faculty of Medicine, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen; Center for Integrated Oncology, Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO(ABCD)).
R BremenDepartment of Hematology, Oncology, Hemostaseology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Faculty of Medicine, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen; Center for Integrated Oncology, Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO(ABCD)).
M DohmenDepartment of Hematology, Oncology, Hemostaseology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Faculty of Medicine, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen; Center for Integrated Oncology, Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO(ABCD)).
B DruekeDepartment of Hematology, Oncology, Hemostaseology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Faculty of Medicine, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen; Center for Integrated Oncology, Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO(ABCD)).
F GeiserCenter for Integrated Oncology, Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO(ABCD)); Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn.
B HaastertmediStatistica, Wuppertal; Institute for Health Services Research and Health Economics, Center for Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Duesseldorf.
L HeierCenter for Integrated Oncology, Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO(ABCD)); Center for Health Communication and Health Services Research, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn; Chair for Health Services Research, Institute of Medical Sociology, Health Services Research, and Rehabilitation Science, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne.
C HeuserCenter for Integrated Oncology, Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO(ABCD)); Center for Health Communication and Health Services Research, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn; Chair for Health Services Research, Institute of Medical Sociology, Health Services Research, and Rehabilitation Science, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne.
S HolstegCenter for Integrated Oncology, Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO(ABCD)); Clinical Institute of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Faculty of Medicine, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Duesseldorf.
A IcksInstitute for Health Services Research and Health Economics, Center for Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Duesseldorf; Institute for Health Services Research and Health Economics, German Diabetes Center, Duesseldorf, Germany.
A KargerCenter for Integrated Oncology, Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO(ABCD)); Clinical Institute of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Faculty of Medicine, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Duesseldorf.
H NakataCenter for Integrated Oncology, Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO(ABCD)); Center for Health Communication and Health Services Research, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn.
A ViehmannInstitute for Health Services Research and Health Economics, Center for Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Duesseldorf.
T H BrümmendorfDepartment of Hematology, Oncology, Hemostaseology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Faculty of Medicine, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen; Center for Integrated Oncology, Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO(ABCD)).
N ErnstmannCenter for Integrated Oncology, Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO(ABCD)); Center for Health Communication and Health Services Research, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn; Chair for Health Services Research, Institute of Medical Sociology, Health Services Research, and Rehabilitation Science, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer patients with minor children but also their families suffer from significant psychological distress and comorbidity. Protective factors predicting successful coping are well known. Corresponding systematic interventions are rare and limited by access barriers. We developed a comprehensive family-centered intervention for cancer patients with at least one dependent minor. PATIENTS AND

methodsFamily-SCOUT represents a multicentric, prospective, interventional, and controlled study for families with parental cancer and their minor children. In the intervention group (IG), all family members were addressed using a care and case management approach for nine months. Families in the control group (CG) received standard of care. Participating parents were asked to complete the Hospital-Anxiety-Depression-Scale (HADS) questionnaire at enrolment (T0) and after 9 months (T2). The primary outcome was a clinically relevant reduction of distress in at least one parent per family, measured as minimal important difference (MID) of ≥1.6 in the HADS total score. The percentage of families achieving MID is compared between the IG and CG by exact Fisher's test, followed by multivariate confounder analyses.

resultsT0-questionnaire of at least one parent was available for 424 of 472 participating families, T2-questionnaire after 9 months was available for 331 families (IG n = 175, CG n = 156). At baseline, both parents showed high levels of distress (HADS total: sick parents IG: 18.7 ± 8.1; CG: 16.0 ± 7.2; healthy partners: IG: 19.1 ± 7.9; CG: 15.2 ± 7.7). The intervention was associated with a significant reduction in parental distress in the IG (MID 70.4% in at least one parent) compared with the CG (MID 55.8%; P = 0.008). Adjustment for group differences from specific confounders retained significance (P = 0.047). Bias from other confounders cannot be excluded.

conclusionsParental cancer leads to a high psychosocial burden in affected families. Significant distress reduction can be achieved through an optimized and structured care approach directed at the family level such as family-SCOUT.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsParentsAdaptation, PsychologicalAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesStress, PsychologicalSurveys and Questionnairescomprehensive support programdistress reductionfamily-SCOUTminorsparental cancerpsychosocial burden

Identifiers

PMID38848662
PMCPMC11214994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.