Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38848154›Full record

SynthesisWork (Reading, Mass.)2024

Meta-analytic structural equation modeling for exploring workplace friendship, well-being, and organizational commitment.

Yin-Che Chen, Yu-Hsiang Wang, Hui-Chuang Chu

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Work (Reading, Mass.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yin-Che ChenDepartment of Educational Psychology and Counseling, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu City, Taiwan.
Yu-Hsiang WangDepartment of Educational Psychology and Counseling, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu City, Taiwan.
Hui-Chuang ChuDepartment of Educational Psychology and Counseling, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu City, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWorkplace friendships, which are informal relationships in the workplace, foster mutual trust, assistance, and emotional support and create a sense of belonging among coworkers. Employees with positive perceptions of their job responsibilities, psychological needs, and work environment experience happiness, satisfaction, and an overall sense of well-being. A heightened sense of well-being in the workplace positively affects employee satisfaction with job tasks and the work environment, reinforcing employees' sense of belonging and organizational commitment.

objectiveThe study proposed and validated a theoretical model, with meta-analytic structural equation modeling employed to conduct quantitative, empirical research on workplace friendships, well-being, and organizational commitment in Taiwan and to analyze correlations between relevant variables.

methodsThe theoretical model was further validated through structural equation modeling, which yielded favorable goodness of fit in terms of various indicators.

resultsThe mediating effect of well-being was verified through bootstrapping analysis. Within a 95% confidence interval, the total effect size of workplace friendships on organizational commitment was 0.549, which is the sum of its direct effect (0.255) and indirect effect (0.294).

conclusionsThis finding indicates that well-being plays a mediating role in the association between workplace friendships and organizational commitment. The proposed theoretical model in this study is supported. Finally, the research results are discussed, and practical suggestions are provided.

Indexed as

FriendsJob SatisfactionWorkplaceHumansInterpersonal RelationsLatent Class AnalysisModels, TheoreticalOrganizational CulturePersonnel LoyaltySurveys and QuestionnairesTaiwanmeta-analytic structural equation modelingorganizational commitmentwell-beingWorkplace friendship

Identifiers

PMID38848154
PMCPMC11613128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.