Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38848067›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2024

An Adaptive Telephone Coaching Intervention for Patients in an Online Weight Loss Program: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Jessica L Unick, Christine A Pellegrini, Shira I Dunsiger, Kathryn E Demos, J Graham Thomas, Dale S Bond, Robert H Lee, Jennifer Webster, Rena R Wing

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03867981 (Phone Coaching and Internet-delivered Weight Loss), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03867981 nacompletednot on this map

Phone Coaching and Internet-delivered Weight Loss

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Miriam HospitalRan2019 to 2023Enrolled452ConditionsObesityArmsInternet-based weight loss program, Brief phone coaching, Extended phone coaching
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jessica L UnickWarren Alpert Medical School at Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Christine A PellegriniDepartment of Exercise Science, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia.
Shira I DunsigerDepartment of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.
Kathryn E DemosWarren Alpert Medical School at Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
J Graham ThomasWarren Alpert Medical School at Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Dale S BondDepartment of Surgery, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut.
Robert H LeeSchool of Medicine, University of Kansas, Kansas City.
Jennifer WebsterWarren Alpert Medical School at Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Rena R WingWarren Alpert Medical School at Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.

Funding

Phone Coaching as a Rescue Strategy for Early Non-Responders Enrolled in an Internet-Delivered Weight Loss ProgramR01DK117843 · NIDDK · MIRIAM HOSPITAL · PI UNICK, JESSICA L · 2018 to 2022
$2.3M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK117843
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Weight loss (WL) during the first month of a behavioral program is associated with longer-term WL. Testing of translatable and adaptive obesity programs is needed. Objective: To compare brief, extended, and no telephone coaching for individuals with suboptimal response (ie, 1-month WL <4%) within an online WL program. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial with enrollment between March 2019 and April 2022 (data collection completed May 2023) was conducted at an academic research center in the US. Eligible participants included adults aged 18 to 70 years with daily access to internet and a body mass index between 25 and 45. Interventions: All participants received an automated online WL program (4 months) and WL maintenance program (8 months), consisting of video lessons, self-monitoring, and personalized feedback. Participants were randomized, such that individuals with suboptimal response received either brief telephone coaching (3 calls during weeks 5-8), extended telephone coaching (12 calls during weeks 5-16), or no coaching (control). Coaching included education, problem solving, and goal setting, and promoted engagement with the online program. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were percent weight change and proportion of participants achieving 5% or greater WL at 4 and 12 months. A priori hypotheses for WL were that WL for extended coaching would be greater than for brief coaching, and both extended and brief coaching would be greater than no coaching (control). A longitudinal mixed-effects model with participant-specific intercept was used to examine intervention effects on percent WL at 4 and 12 months. Secondary analyses focused on program engagement and cost/kilogram of WL. Results: The study included a total of 437 participants who reported WL at 1 month (mean [SD] age, 50.8 [11.4] years; mean [SD] BMI, 34.6 [5.0]; 305 female [69.8%] and 132 male [30.2%]) with 148 randomized to extended coaching, 143 assigned to brief coaching, and 146 assigned to the control group. Of all participants, 346 (79.2%) were considered to have a suboptimal response. WL at 4 months was significantly greater in the extended coaching group (mean [SD] WL, -7.0% [5.1%]) and brief coaching group (mean [SD] WL, -6.2% [4.7%]) vs the control group (mean [SD] WL, -4.5% [4.7%]) (P < .001). Similarly, the proportion of participants achieving 5% or greater WL at 4 months was greater in the extended coaching group (89 participants [65.9%]) and brief coaching group (77 participants [58.5%]) vs control group (46 participants [36.5%]) (P < .001). At 12 months, a similar pattern was observed for achievement of 5% WL or greater (extended coaching, 63 participants [48.1%]; brief coaching, 58 participants [45.9%]; control, 38 participants [32.8%]; P = .03). Percent WL at 12 months was significantly higher in extended coaching vs control (mean [SD] WL for extended coaching, -5.5% [6.7%]; mean [SD] WL for control, -3.9% [7.4%]; P = .03) but not for brief coaching (mean [SD] WL, -4.9% [6.1%]).Both the brief and extended coaching groups watched more lessons and self-monitored on more days compared with the control group. The cost per additional kilogram of WL, beyond that of the control group, was $50.09 for brief coaching and $92.65 for extended coaching. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial testing an adaptive intervention, the provision of coaching for individuals with suboptimal response improved WL and was cost-effective; further testing in clinical settings (eg, health care systems) is warranted. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03867981.

Indexed as

MentoringObesityTelephoneWeight Reduction ProgramsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedWeight Loss

Identifiers

PMID38848067
PMCPMC11161849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.