Observational studyJAMA network open2024
Bariatric Metabolic Surgery vs Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists and Mortality.
Observational study in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
43 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Comparative Cardiovascular Outcomes of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists Versus Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism · 2026Pooled it
- 2026 AHA/ACC/ADA/ASN Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic Syndrome: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2026Guideline
- Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists vs. Bariatric Endoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis of Efficacy, Safety, and Metabolic Outcomes.Obesity surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Metabolic Bariatric Surgery versus GLP-1 Receptor Agonists for Obesity Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Obesity surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Comparing Cardiovascular Outcomes of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists Versus Metabolic Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Obesity surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Psoriasis outcomes following metabolic bariatric surgery - a systematic review of the literature.BMC surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Ring-Augmented Versus Non-Ring Augmented Sleeve Gastrectomy in Patients with BMI > 50 kg/m²: 3-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Trial.Obesity surgery · 2026Trial
- Intraoperative botulinum toxin injection in sleeve gastrectomy, a pilot randomized controlled trial.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Trial
- Adipose Tissue Remodeling Beyond Weight Loss: New Insights Into Incretin-Based Therapies and Bariatric Surgery.Current obesity reports · 2026Review
- Managing patient fears around bariatric surgery: a qualitative study of communication differences between high- and low-referring primary care providers.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Limited Comparative Evidence Between Metabolic Bariatric Surgery and Incretin-Based Pharmacotherapy for Weight Loss in Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of diabetes · 2026Article
- Review
- Real-World Effectiveness of Semaglutide and Tirzepatide Compared With Bariatric Surgery.Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.) · 2026Article
- GLP-1 receptor agonists at the crossroads of diabetes, hepatic steatosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma.Internal and emergency medicine · 2026Review
- Optimal Timing of GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Initiation in Patients with Obesity Eligible for Metabolic Bariatric Surgery.Obesity surgery · 2026Article
- Long-Term Health Care Utilization Costs of GLP-1RA Use vs Bariatric Metabolic Surgery.JAMA network open · 2026Observational
- Initiation of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists Treatment after Bariatric Metabolic Surgery and Major Adverse Cardiac Events.Obesity facts · 2026Article
- Incretin polyagonists as an alternative to bariatric surgery to manage obesity.World journal of gastrointestinal pathophysiology · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Evidence regarding the relative effectiveness of bariatric metabolic surgery (BMS) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) in reducing mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) is limited. Objective: To compare all-cause mortality and nonfatal MACEs associated with BMS vs GLP-1RAs for adults with obesity and diabetes and without known cardiovascular disease. Design, Setting, and Participants: This observational, retrospective cohort study was based on data obtained from the electronic medical records of Clalit Health Services (Clalit), the largest health care organization in Israel. The study included 6070 members aged 24 years or older, who had diabetes and obesity and no prior history of ischemic heart disease, ischemic stroke, or congestive heart failure. Patients who underwent BMS and patients who received GLP-1RAs from January 1, 2008, through December 31, 2021, were matched 1:1 by age, sex, and clinical characteristics. Follow-up ended December 31, 2022. Exposures: Initiation of BMS or GLP-1RAs. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, assessed by multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models. The secondary outcome was nonfatal MACEs, assessed by multivariate competing risk models. Results: The study included 3035 matched pairs of patients (total, 6070; mean [SD] age, 51.0 [9.5] years; 3938 women [64.9%]), who were followed up for a median of 6.8 years (IQR, 4.1-9.4 years). Among those with a diabetes duration of 10 years or less (2371 pairs), mortality was lower for those who underwent BMS than for those treated with GLP-1RAs (hazard ratio [HR], 0.38; 95% CI, 0.25-0.58). This association became nonsignificant when weight loss during the follow-up period was also included in the model (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.43-1.48). Among patients with a duration of diabetes longer than 10 years (664 pairs), no survival advantage was demonstrated for BMS over GLP-1RA (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.39-1.08). The risk for nonfatal MACEs did not differ between the treatment groups (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.49-1.10 among patients with a diabetes duration of ≤10 years; HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.80-1.85 among patients with a diabetes duration of >10 years). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, BMS was associated with greater reduced mortality compared with first-generation GLP-1RAs among individuals with a diabetes duration of 10 years or less, mediated via greater weight loss. No differences in the risk for mortality were observed between the treatment modalities among individuals with a longer duration of diabetes, nor in the occurrence of nonfatal MACEs among all patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.