Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38847946›Full record

ArticleBulletin of mathematical biology2024

Evolutionary Game Dynamics with Environmental Feedback in a Network with Two Communities.

Katherine Betz, Feng Fu, Naoki Masuda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bulletin of mathematical biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Katherine BetzDepartment of Mathematics, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, 14260-2900, USA.
Feng FuDepartment of Mathematics, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, 03755, USA.
Naoki MasudaDepartment of Mathematics, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, 14260-2900, USA. naokimas@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1567-801X

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science London JP21H04595Japan Society for the Promotion of Science London JP23H03414Moonshot Research and Development Program JPMJMS2021National Science Foundation 2052720National Science Foundation 2204936
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent developments of eco-evolutionary models have shown that evolving feedbacks between behavioral strategies and the environment of game interactions, leading to changes in the underlying payoff matrix, can impact the underlying population dynamics in various manners. We propose and analyze an eco-evolutionary game dynamics model on a network with two communities such that players interact with other players in the same community and those in the opposite community at different rates. In our model, we consider two-person matrix games with pairwise interactions occurring on individual edges and assume that the environmental state depends on edges rather than on nodes or being globally shared in the population. We analytically determine the equilibria and their stability under a symmetric population structure assumption, and we also numerically study the replicator dynamics of the general model. The model shows rich dynamical behavior, such as multiple transcritical bifurcations, multistability, and anti-synchronous oscillations. Our work offers insights into understanding how the presence of community structure impacts the eco-evolutionary dynamics within and between niches.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionGame TheoryMathematical ConceptsPopulation DynamicsAnimalsComputer SimulationEcosystemEnvironmentFeedbackHumansModels, BiologicalBifurcation analysisEvolutionary game theoryFeedback-evolving gamesOscillatory dynamics

Identifiers

PMID38847946
PMCPMC11161456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.