Trial reportWorld journal of urology2024
Efficacy of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation combined with mirabegron therapy compared with mirabegron monotherapy for overactive bladder: a prospective randomized controlled study.
Trial report in World journal of urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation combined mirabegron therapy significantly improves benign prostatic hyperplasia and overactive bladder: a prospective randomized controlled trial.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe objective was to evaluate the efficacy of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) combined with mirabegron therapy compared with mirabegron monotherapy in the treatment of female patients with overactive bladder (OAB).
methodsIn this randomized controlled study, 100 female outpatients with OAB were screened. Among these patients, 86 who met the inclusion criteria were randomly divided into the TENS combined with mirabegron treatment group and mirabegron monotherapy treatment group, with 43 patients in each group. The voiding diary, Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS), Overactive Bladder Questionnaire Symptom Bother Score (OAB-q SBS), total health-related quality of life (OAB-q HRQoL), and treatment satisfaction-visual analog scale (TS-VAS) score before and after treatment were recorded to evaluate the efficacy of OAB treatment. Seventy-nine of the 86 patients (40 in the TENS plus mirabegron group and 39 in the mirabegron monotherapy group) completed 12 weeks of treatment.
resultsTENS combined with mirabegron therapy was superior to mirabegron monotherapy in improving the primary endpoints, including the daily number of micturition episodes and the daily MVV/micturition and secondary endpoints, including the daily number of urgency episodes, the OABSS, the OAB-q SBS, the HRQoL score and TS-VAS score. There were no statistically significant differences in urgency urinary incontinence and nocturia between the groups. Some minor adverse effects were observed, including muscle pain, local paresthesia and constipation.
conclusionsThe combination of TENS and mirabegron was more effective than mirabegron alone in the treatment of female patients with OAB. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2400080528 (31.01.2024, retrospectively registered).
Indexed as
Identifiers
38847900What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.