Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38847899›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2024

Off-clamp robotic partial nephrectomy is a safe and effective approach for patients with T1b or greater renal tumors.

Ethan H Vargo, Joel M Vetter, Eric H Kim, Sam Bhayani, R Sherburne Figenshau

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ethan H VargoDivision of Urologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA. vargo@wustl.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2084-5401
Joel M VetterDivision of Urologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Eric H KimDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Nevada Reno School of Medicine; Department of Physiology and Cell Biology, University of Nevada Reno School of Medicine, University of Nevada Reno, Reno, NV, USA.
Sam BhayaniDivision of Urologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
R Sherburne FigenshauDivision of Urologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) is a gold standard treatment for focal kidney tumors. Off-clamp RPN avoids prolonged ischemia times. We sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of off-clamp RPN in patients with renal tumors > 4 centimeters (cm). From 2007 to 2021, we examined patients who underwent RPN for cT1b-T2N0M0 renal tumors. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative outcomes were examined for patients who underwent on or off-clamp RPN. Patients with cT1b tumors (4-7 cm) who underwent either approach were retrospectively propensity-matched based on renal function and tumor size. Of 225 patients, on-clamp RPN was employed in 147 patients, while 78 patients underwent an off-clamp approach. Preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was significantly lower in the off-clamp group (p = 0.026). Mean nephrometry scores and mean tumor sizes were similar between cohorts. Average estimated blood loss (EBL) and operative times were similar. Major complication risk was 4.4% lower in the off-clamp group. Blood transfusion rate was 5.6% lower in the off-clamp group. Patients in the off-clamp cohort experienced a < 2% higher risk of positive margins. Postoperative eGFR was more favorable for off-clamp RPN following surgery at 1 year. The propensity-matched analysis demonstrated similar intraoperative outcomes. Blood transfusion rate was significantly lower at 1.5% for patients who underwent off-clamp RPN (p = 0.03). Risk of a major complication was 6.1% lower in the off-clamp RPN cohort, while postoperative eGFR and positive margin rates were similar between off and on-clamp groups. A non-inferior approach for patients with cT1b-T2N0M0 and moderately complex localized renal masses is off-clamp RPN.

Indexed as

Glomerular Filtration RateKidney NeoplasmsNephrectomyRobotic Surgical ProceduresAgedBlood Loss, SurgicalFemaleHumansMaleMargins of ExcisionMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingOperative TimePostoperative ComplicationsPropensity ScoreRetrospective StudiesLarge renal massNephrometry scoreOff-clampPartial nephrectomy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.