Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38847898›Full record

ArticleRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2024

[Large language models from OpenAI, Google, Meta, X and Co. : The role of "closed" and "open" models in radiology].

Sebastian Nowak, Alois M Sprinkart

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [Technical foundations of large language models].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  2. Assessment of decision-making with locally run and web-based large language models versus human board recommendations in otorhinolaryngology, head and neck surgery.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sebastian NowakKlinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Deutschland. Sebastian.Nowak@ukbonn.de.
Alois M SprinkartKlinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2023, the release of ChatGPT triggered an artificial intelligence (AI) boom. The underlying large language models (LLM) of the nonprofit organization "OpenAI" are not freely available under open-source licenses, which does not allow on-site implementation inside secure clinic networks. However, efforts are being made by open-source communities, start-ups and large tech companies to democratize the use of LLMs. This opens up the possibility of using LLMs in a data protection-compliant manner and even adapting them to our own data.

objectivesThis paper aims to explain the potential of privacy-compliant local LLMs for radiology and to provide insights into the "open" versus "closed" dynamics of the currently rapidly developing field of AI. MATERIALS AND

methodsPubMed search for radiology articles with LLMs and subjective selection of references in the sense of a narrative key topic article.

resultsVarious stakeholders, including large tech companies such as Meta, Google and X, but also European start-ups such as Mistral AI, contribute to the democratization of LLMs by publishing the models (open weights) or by publishing the model and source code (open source). Their performance is lower than current "closed" LLMs, such as GPT‑4 from OpenAI.

conclusionDespite differences in performance, open and thus locally implementable LLMs show great promise for improving the efficiency and quality of diagnostic reporting as well as interaction with patients and enable retrospective extraction of diagnostic information for secondary use of clinical free-text databases for research, teaching or clinical application.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceRadiologyHumansData privacyDeep learningLarge language modelsNatural language processingOpen source

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.