ArticleRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2024
[Large language models from OpenAI, Google, Meta, X and Co. : The role of "closed" and "open" models in radiology].
Article in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Technical foundations of large language models].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Assessment of decision-making with locally run and web-based large language models versus human board recommendations in otorhinolaryngology, head and neck surgery.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025Article
- A comparative accuracy study of multimodal LLMs, VLM and agent-based framework for pulmonary nodule detection on chest radiographs.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
- Utilization of large language models in decision-making for sustainability in radiology.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn 2023, the release of ChatGPT triggered an artificial intelligence (AI) boom. The underlying large language models (LLM) of the nonprofit organization "OpenAI" are not freely available under open-source licenses, which does not allow on-site implementation inside secure clinic networks. However, efforts are being made by open-source communities, start-ups and large tech companies to democratize the use of LLMs. This opens up the possibility of using LLMs in a data protection-compliant manner and even adapting them to our own data.
objectivesThis paper aims to explain the potential of privacy-compliant local LLMs for radiology and to provide insights into the "open" versus "closed" dynamics of the currently rapidly developing field of AI. MATERIALS AND
methodsPubMed search for radiology articles with LLMs and subjective selection of references in the sense of a narrative key topic article.
resultsVarious stakeholders, including large tech companies such as Meta, Google and X, but also European start-ups such as Mistral AI, contribute to the democratization of LLMs by publishing the models (open weights) or by publishing the model and source code (open source). Their performance is lower than current "closed" LLMs, such as GPT‑4 from OpenAI.
conclusionDespite differences in performance, open and thus locally implementable LLMs show great promise for improving the efficiency and quality of diagnostic reporting as well as interaction with patients and enable retrospective extraction of diagnostic information for secondary use of clinical free-text databases for research, teaching or clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38847898What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.