Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38847882›Full record

ArticleParasitology research2024

Strategic control of the cattle tick Rhipicephlaus microplus applied to rotational and silvopastoral grazing systems in subtropical areas.

Santiago Nava, Maria V Rossner, Jose R Toffaletti, Miguel Da Luz, M Belen Rossner, Marcelo Signorini, Nicolás Morel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Parasitology research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Santiago NavaIDICAL (INTA-CONICET), Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA) E.E.A. Rafaela, Ruta 34 Km 227, Rafaela, Santa Fe, Argentina. nava.santiago@inta.gob.ar.
Maria V RossnerInstituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA) E.E.A. El Colonia Benítez, Colonia Benítez, Chaco, Argentina.
Jose R ToffalettiInstituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA) E.E.A. El Colorado, El Colorado, Formosa, Argentina.
Miguel Da LuzInstituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Cerro Azul, Misiones, Argentina.
M Belen RossnerUniversidad del Salvador, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias y Veterinarias, Delegación Corrientes, Gobernador Virasoro, Corrientes, Argentina.
Marcelo SignoriniIDICAL (INTA-CONICET), Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA) E.E.A. Rafaela, Ruta 34 Km 227, Rafaela, Santa Fe, Argentina.
Nicolás MorelIDICAL (INTA-CONICET), Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA) E.E.A. Rafaela, Ruta 34 Km 227, Rafaela, Santa Fe, Argentina.

Funding

Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria PE044
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This work evaluated if strategic control based on no more than three or four annual treatments is useful to control Rhipicephalus microplus infestations on cattle when it is applied to intensive rotational grazing and silvopastoral systems with high stocking rates in subtropical areas. In the intensive rotational grazing system, three annual treatments with chemical acaricides were applied on cattle in two different schemes: between spring and early summer and from late winter and late spring. Strategic control based on three treatments with chemical acaricides from late winter to late spring plus an additional fourth treatment in summer was tested in the silvopastoral system. In the intensive rotational grazing systems, the control schemes allow to reach a significant reduction in the tick load on cattle considering a time interval from spring to autumn. However, the efficacy levels were not high enough in some specific moments, namely, the tick counts of summer and autumn (there were not significant differences between treated and control groups). The scheme evaluated in the silvopastoral grazing system yielded better results than those tested for the intensive rotational system, because significant differences in tick load between treated and control groups were observed in all post-treatment counts and when the analysis was performed for the whole study period. However, values of efficacy in the count-by-count comparison were disparate, ranging from 64.1 to 99.7. Although the efficacy values obtained in the silvopastoral system were better than those of the rotational grazing systems, the total tick load on treated cattle in autumn was not low enough (mean abundance values 25.14 and 38.14). Ticks were more evenly distributed among hosts in late summer and autumn than in spring or early summer, where few hosts carry most of the ticks. Some management strategies as intensive rotational systems or silvopastoral structures can lead to a more efficient forage use, but they imply greater tick challenge than in extensive grazing systems. In these situations, the schemes of strategic control bases on three or four annual treatments should be complemented with additional tactical treatments in late summer or autumn.

Indexed as

Cattle DiseasesRhipicephalusSeasonsTick ControlTick InfestationsAcaricidesAnimal HusbandryAnimalsCattleAcaricidesCattle tickChemical controlHigh stocking ratesSilvopastoral grazingTick aggregation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.