Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38847119›Full record

ArticleEuro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin2024

Genomic surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 evolution by a centralised pipeline and weekly focused sequencing, Austria, January 2021 to March 2023.

Olga Frank, David Acitores Balboa, Maria Novatchkova, Ezgi Özkan, Marcus Martin Strobl, Ramesh Yelagandula, Tanino Guiseppe Albanese, Lukas Endler, Fabian Amman, Vera Felsenstein and 19 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Improving public health laboratory preparedness at European Union level: learning points from experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors.

Olga FrankInstitute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Science (IMBA), Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria.
David Acitores BalboaInstitute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Science (IMBA), Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria.
Maria NovatchkovaInstitute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Science (IMBA), Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria.
Ezgi ÖzkanInstitute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Science (IMBA), Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria.
Marcus Martin StroblResearch Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria.
Ramesh YelagandulaInstitute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Science (IMBA), Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria.
Tanino Guiseppe AlbaneseMax Perutz Laboratories, University of Vienna, Department of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria.
Lukas EndlerCeMM Research Center for Molecular Medicine of the Austrian Academy of Science, Vienna, Austria.
Fabian AmmanCeMM Research Center for Molecular Medicine of the Austrian Academy of Science, Vienna, Austria.
Vera FelsensteinInstitute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Science (IMBA), Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria.
Milanka GavrilovicInstitute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Science (IMBA), Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria.
Melanie AcostaInstitute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Science (IMBA), Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria.
Timothej PatockaVienna Biocenter Core Facilities GmbH (VBCF), Vienna, Austria.
Alexander VogtVienna Biocenter Core Facilities GmbH (VBCF), Vienna, Austria.
Ido TamirVienna Biocenter Core Facilities GmbH (VBCF), Vienna, Austria.
Julia KlikovitsÖsterreichische Agentur für Gesundheit und Ernährungssicherheit (AGES), Vienna, Austria.
Alexander ZoufalyDepartment of Medicine, Klink Favoriten, Vienna, Austria.
Tamara SeitzDepartment of Medicine, Klink Favoriten, Vienna, Austria.
Manuela FödingerInstitute of Laboratory Diagnostics, Clinic Favoriten, Vienna, Austria.
Andreas BergthalerCeMM Research Center for Molecular Medicine of the Austrian Academy of Science, Vienna, Austria.
Alexander IndraÖsterreichische Agentur für Gesundheit und Ernährungssicherheit (AGES), Vienna, Austria.
Daniela SchmidDepartment of infection diagnostics and infectious disease epidemiology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
Peter KlimekComplexity Science Hub Vienna, Vienna, Austria Section for Science of Complex Systems, CeMSIIS, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Alexander StarkMedical University of Vienna, Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria.
Franz AllerbergerÖsterreichische Agentur für Gesundheit und Ernährungssicherheit (AGES), Vienna, Austria.
Bernhard BenkaÖsterreichische Agentur für Gesundheit und Ernährungssicherheit (AGES), Vienna, Austria.
Katharina ReichFederal Ministry of Social Affairs, Health, Care and Consumer Protection, Vienna.
Luisa CochellaPresent address: Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Ulrich EllingInstitute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Science (IMBA), Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic was largely driven by genetic mutations of SARS-CoV-2, leading in some instances to enhanced infectiousness of the virus or its capacity to evade the host immune system. To closely monitor SARS-CoV-2 evolution and resulting variants at genomic-level, an innovative pipeline termed SARSeq was developed in Austria.AimWe discuss technical aspects of the SARSeq pipeline, describe its performance and present noteworthy results it enabled during the pandemic in Austria.MethodsThe SARSeq pipeline was set up as a collaboration between private and public clinical diagnostic laboratories, a public health agency, and an academic institution. Representative SARS-CoV-2 positive specimens from each of the nine Austrian provinces were obtained from SARS-CoV-2 testing laboratories and processed centrally in an academic setting for S-gene sequencing and analysis.ResultsSARS-CoV-2 sequences from up to 2,880 cases weekly resulted in 222,784 characterised case samples in January 2021-March 2023. Consequently, Austria delivered the fourth densest genomic surveillance worldwide in a very resource-efficient manner. While most SARS-CoV-2 variants during the study showed comparable kinetic behaviour in all of Austria, some, like Beta, had a more focused spread. This highlighted multifaceted aspects of local population-level acquired immunity. The nationwide surveillance system enabled reliable nowcasting. Measured early growth kinetics of variants were predictive of later incidence peaks.ConclusionWith low automation, labour, and cost requirements, SARSeq is adaptable to monitor other pathogens and advantageous even for resource-limited countries. This multiplexed genomic surveillance system has potential as a rapid response tool for future emerging threats.

Indexed as

COVID-19Genome, ViralSARS-CoV-2AustriaEvolution, MolecularGenomicsHumansMutationPandemicsWhole Genome SequencingCovid-19NGSpandemic preparedness, disease X, genomic surveillance, nowcasting, SARSeq, AustriaSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID38847119
PMCPMC11158012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.