ArticleJournal of animal science2024
Potential negative effects of genomic selection.
Article in Journal of animal science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genome-wide association analysis reveals genetic architecture of fertility traits in Sahiwal heifers and cows.Tropical animal health and production · 2026Article
- Genetic parameters via predictivity in large populations under strong genomic selection.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2026Article
- Effect of selection for growth on reproductive traits in Nellore females: Genetic parameters and genome-wide association studies.Journal of applied genetics · 2026Article
- Restructuring breeding programs 1: Integration of diversity.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2026Article
- Strategies to improve on selection based on estimated breeding values.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2026Article
- Genetic diversity and population structure of U.S. Suffolk sheep participating in the national sheep improvement program.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2026Article
- Identification ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- Breeding for improved heat tolerance in dairy cattle: Methods, challenges, and progress.JDS communications · 2025Article
- Genome-Wide Association Mapping of Macronutrient Mineral Accumulation in Wheat (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Initial findings on genomic selection (GS) indicated substantial improvement for major traits, such as performance, and even successful selection for antagonistic traits. However, recent unofficial reports indicate an increased frequency of deterioration of secondary traits. This phenomenon may arise due to the mismatch between the accelerated selection process and resource allocation. Traits explicitly or implicitly accounted for by a selection index move toward the desired direction, whereas neglected traits change according to the genetic correlations with selected traits. Historically, the first stage of commercial genetic selection focused on production traits. After long-term selection, production traits improved, whereas fitness traits deteriorated, although this deterioration was partially compensated for by constantly improving management. Adding these fitness traits to the breeding objective and the used selection index also helped offset their decline while promoting long-term gains. Subsequently, the trend in observed fitness traits was a combination of a negative response due to genetic antagonism, positive response from inclusion in the selection index, and a positive effect of improving management. Under GS, the genetic trends accelerate, especially for well-recorded higher heritability traits, magnifying the negatively correlated responses for fitness traits. Then, the observed trend for fitness traits can become negative, especially because management modifications do not accelerate under GS. Additional deterioration can occur due to the rapid turnover of GS, as heritabilities for production traits can decline and the genetic antagonism between production and fitness traits can intensify. If the genetic parameters are not updated, the selection index will be inaccurate, and the intended gains will not occur. While the deterioration can accelerate for unrecorded or sparsely recorded fitness traits, GS can lead to an improvement for widely recorded fitness traits. In the context of GS, it is crucial to look for unexpected changes in relevant traits and take rapid steps to prevent further declines, especially in secondary traits. Changes can be anticipated by investigating the temporal dynamics of genetic parameters, especially genetic correlations. However, new methods are needed to estimate genetic parameters for the last generation with large amounts of genomic data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.