Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38847016›Full record

ArticleEndoscopy international open2024

Single-center experience with intraprocedural cleansing system to improve inadequate bowel preparation during colonoscopy.

Tessa Herman, Nicha Wongjarupong, Natalie Wilson, Bryant Megna, Vijay Are, Anders Westanmo, Susan Lou, Mohammad Bilal, Brian J Hanson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endoscopy international open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Optimizing detection and resection of colorectal polyps.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tessa HermanDepartment of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical Center, Minneapolis, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7884-6696
Nicha WongjarupongDepartment of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical Center, Minneapolis, United States.
Natalie WilsonDepartment of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical Center, Minneapolis, United States.
Bryant MegnaDepartment of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical Center, Minneapolis, United States.
Vijay AreDepartment of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical Center, Minneapolis, United States.
Anders WestanmoGastroenterology Section, Minneapolis VA Medical Center, Minneapolis, United States.
Susan LouGastroenterology Section, Minneapolis VA Medical Center, Minneapolis, United States.
Mohammad BilalGastroenterology Section, Minneapolis VA Medical Center, Minneapolis, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1784-212X
Brian J HansonGastroenterology Section, Minneapolis VA Medical Center, Minneapolis, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inadequate bowel preparation is common despite various preprocedure interventions. There is a need for an intervention at the time of colonoscopy to combat poor preparation. In this retrospective, observational study of 46 patients, we evaluated the clinical efficacy and feasibility of implementing the third generation of the Pure-Vu EVS System, a US Food and Drug Administration-cleared over-the-scope-based intraprocedural cleansing device, into our practice at the Minneapolis VA Medical Center (Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States). To study clinical efficacy, we measured bowel preparation adequacy before and after using the device, as measured by the Boston Bowel Preparation Score, and reviewed colonoscopy surveillance interval recommendations. Technical success and feasibility of using the device were measured by procedure success rates and duration. We found that BBPS scores increased from 4.4 to 7.9 when using the device. Technical success was achieved 78.3% of the time (36/46 cases). Median colonoscopy duration was 46 minutes, although there was a trend toward shorter procedures over time. This is the first clinical evaluation of the third generation of an intraprocedural cleansing device. We found the device efficacious and easy to use with low procedure failure rates, but it does come with a learning curve. We suspect that adoption of this device mutually will benefit patients and health systems with the potential to improve resource utilization.

Indexed as

CRC screeningEndoscopy Lower GI TractPolyps / adenomas / ...Quality and logistical aspectsQuality management

Identifiers

PMID38847016
PMCPMC11156514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.