Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38846948›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in immunology2024

The efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy combined with immunotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer patients: a systematic review.

Lei Yang, Xiujing Cui, Fengpeng Wu, Zifeng Chi, Linlin Xiao, Xuan Wang, Zezheng Liang, Xiaoning Li, Qiyao Yu, Xueqin Lin and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Lei Yang *Department of Radiation Oncology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Xiujing Cui *Department of Radiation Oncology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Fengpeng WuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Zifeng ChiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Linlin XiaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Xuan WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Zezheng LiangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Xiaoning LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Qiyao YuDepartment of Research, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China.
Xueqin LinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Chao GaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Several studies have explored the effectiveness of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer(LARC), particularly in microsatellite stable(MSS) or mismatch repair proficient(pMMR) LARC patients. We undertook a single-arm systematic review to comprehensively evaluate the advantages and potential risks associated with the use of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in conjunction with nCRT for patients diagnosed with locally advanced rectal cancer. Methods: The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, ASCO and ESMO were searched for related studies. The main outcomes were pathologic complete response (pCR), major pathological response (MPR), anal preservation, and adverse effects (AEs). Results: Fourteen articles including 533 locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients were analyzed. The pooled pCR, MPR, and anal preservation rates were 36%, 66% and 86%. Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 20%. Subgroup analysis showed that; dMMR/MSI-H had a pooled pCR (100%) and MPR (100%), pMMR/MSS had a pooled pCR (38%) and MPR (60%); the short-course radiotherapy and long-course radiotherapy had pooled pCR rates of 51% and 30%, respectively. The rates of pCR for the concurrent and sequential immuno-chemoradiotherapy subgroups at 30% and 40%, mirroring pCR rates for the PD-L1 and PD-1 inhibitor subgroups were 32% and 40%, respectively. Conclusion: In cases of locally advanced rectal cancer, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy have shown promising response rates and acceptable toxicity profiles. PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy hence has a positive outcome even in MSS LARC patients. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#myprospero, identifier CRD42023465380.

Indexed as

Immune Checkpoint InhibitorsNeoadjuvant TherapyRectal NeoplasmsChemoradiotherapyHumansImmunotherapyTreatment OutcomeImmune Checkpoint Inhibitorsneoadjuvant chemoradiotherapyneoadjuvant immunotherapyPD-1/PD-L1 inhibitorsrectal cancer (RC)systematic review

Identifiers

PMID38846948
PMCPMC11154111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.