ArticleFrontiers in immunology2024
CAP2 contributes to Parkinson's disease diagnosed by neutrophil extracellular trap-related immune activity.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Targeting Neutrophil Extracellular Traps in Neuroinflammation: A Therapeutic Perspective on Neurodegenerative Diseases.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Autophagy-mediated regulation of neutrophil inflammatory responses and its relevance to central nervous system diseases.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) constitute a crucial element of the immune system, and dysfunction in immune responses is implicated in the susceptibility and progression of Parkinson's disease (PD). Nevertheless, the mechanism connecting PD and NETs remains unclear. This study aims to uncover potential NETs-related immune biomarkers and elucidate their role in PD pathogenesis. Methods: Through differential gene analysis of PD and NETs in GSE7621 datasets, we identified two PD subtypes and explored potential biological pathways. Subsequently, using ClusterWGCNA, we pinpointed pertinent genes and developed clinical diagnostic models. We then optimized the chosen model and evaluated its association with immune infiltration. Validation was conducted using the GSE20163 dataset. Screening the single-cell dataset GSE132758 revealed cell populations associated with the identified gene. Results: Our findings identified XGB as the optimal diagnostic model, with CAP2 identified as a pivotal gene. The risk model effectively predicted overall diagnosis rates, demonstrating a robust correlation between infiltrating immune cells and genes related to the XGB model. Discussion: In conclusions, we identified PD subtypes and diagnostic genes associated with NETs, highlighting CAP2 as a pivotal gene. These findings have significant implications for understanding potential molecular mechanisms and treatments for PD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.