ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2024
A comparative radiographic study of bone density changes around titanium implants in the posterior mandible, preoperative, and postoperative.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Dentine-derived barrier membrane versus extended platelet-rich fibrin for guided bone regeneration: a 2-year randomized clinical trial.BMC oral health · 2026Trial
- Analysis of Risk Factors Affecting Postoperative Success Rate and Postoperative Pain After Orthodontic Microimplant Nail Implantation and Improvement of Treatment Strategy.Oral health & preventive dentistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Implant success and the state of the surrounding bone require multiple measures, especially in humans, and this study aimed to identify the development of the state of the latter by means of radiographic examination performed during the period of osseointegration as well as investigate the changes in bone density that occur after implant installation and 2 months after functional loading. Implant success rates are affected by bone density at the implant site. Therefore, understanding changes in bone density after dental implant placement is essential, as it correlates with subsequent implant success. Materials and methods: Digital radiographs of 28 implants were taken and evaluated at four intervals: preoperatively, 1 and 3 months postoperatively, and 2 months following placement of the permanent prosthesis. Gray values were measured in different areas around the implants through analyzing X-ray images and measuring bone density around the implants using EzDent - 2D software. The aim of this study was to investigate changes in bone density around implants in three regions: apex, neck, and body, as well as to record average density values during the observation period by measuring digital image gray levels (the gray values of the digital radiographs). This was conducted to determine local bone densities in dental implant recipient sites and to study changes in local bone densities at different intervals, preoperatively and postoperatively and after placement of the prosthesis. Results: A decrease was observed in gray values proportional to reference values 1-month after implant insertion, but these increased at 3 months after insertion and continued to rise 2 months after placement of the prosthesis in the apical, body, and neck regions of the implant. Conclusion: Sensor-tuned radiography can be used as an effective method to support clinical follow-ups as well as measure changes in bone densities around implants in critical cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.