ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2024
Falciform technique in laparoscopic revision of distal catheter obstruction: an evaluation.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Distal catheter fixation in ventriculoperitoneal shunt by videolaparoscopy - Technical note.Surgical neurology international · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunting is a cornerstone treatment for hydrocephalus, a condition characterized by the abnormal accumulation of cerebrospinal fluid in the ventricles of the brain. Despite its efficacy, this procedure is associated with various complications, among which distal catheter obstruction poses significant challenges. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the Materials and methods: This study retrospectively analyzed 28 patients with VP shunt distal catheter obstructions who underwent laparoscopy-assisted shunt revision between January 2016 and June 2022. All of these were done using the Results: The most common etiology of primary shunt surgery was hydrocephalus, followed by intracranial hemorrhage (42.9%) and traumatic brain injury (32.1%). Normal pressure hydrocephalus occurs in 14.3% of cases. Fifteen patients (53.6%) required revision surgery within 1 year of index surgery. Thirteen patients (46.4%) underwent revision surgery more than 1 year after the index surgery, either as a first revision or subsequent revision. The average surgery time was 32.1±14.7 min and hospital stay was 4.2±1.8 days. After a mean follow-up period of at 20.3±8.7 months, except for three patients who died from other causes (two patients due to pneumonia and one due to exhaustion), there were no shunt-related complications in the remaining 25 patients. Conclusions: Laparoscopy with the application of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.