Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38846749›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2024

The role of attention bias malleability in experiencing pain and associated disability.

Justine L Mac Goris, Jemma Todd, Patrick J F Clarke, Alicia M Hughes, Claus Vögele, Dimitri M L Van Ryckeghem

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Justine L Mac GorisDepartment of Clinical Psychological Science, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Jemma ToddSchool Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Patrick J F ClarkeCurtin School of Population Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University of Technology, Curtin, Australia.
Alicia M HughesDepartment of Psychological Medecine, King's College London, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Claus VögeleDepartment of Behavioral and Cognitive Sciences, University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.
Dimitri M L Van RyckeghemDepartment of Clinical Psychological Science, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands.

Funding

FNR Core Junior programme
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Attentional processing of pain has been theorized to play a key role in the severity of pain and associated disability. In particular attentional bias towards pain information, resulting in poor pain outcomes, has been extensively researched. Recently, the idea was put forward that attention bias malleability (AM), Methods: In Study 1, 55 healthy participants completed an AM paradigm, followed by an experimental heat pain paradigm probing pain experience and pain-related task interference. In Study 2, 71 people with chronic pain completed an AM paradigm and questionnaires probing pain experience and associated disability. Results: In Study 1, including healthy participants, no relationship was found between AM indices and experimental pain outcomes. In Study 2, including chronic pain patients, results indicated that higher levels of overall AM were related to higher levels of pain experience and disability. Conclusion: This study partially supports the hypotheses that the degree to which individuals can adapt their attentional preference in line with changing environmental conditions is associated with poor pain outcomes. However, future research is needed to clarify inconsistent findings between healthy volunteers and chronic pain patients as well as to determine the causal status of AM in poor pain outcomes.

Indexed as

Attentional BiasChronic PainAdultAttentionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementPersons with DisabilitiesSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAttentional biasAttentional bias malleabilityAttentional bias modificiationChronic pain

Identifiers

PMID38846749
PMCPMC11155670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.