Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38846622›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2024

"

R Ogrin, E Robinson, K Rendell, S Alrababah, D Fineberg, K Fiddes, A Yerolemou, M H Lim, L Engel, J A Lowthian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

R OgrinBolton Clarke Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
E RobinsonBolton Clarke Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
K RendellBolton Clarke Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
S AlrababahBolton Clarke Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
D FinebergAlfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
K FiddesAustralian Disease Management Association, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
A YerolemouSouth Eastern Melbourne Public Health Network, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
M H LimPrevention Research Collaboration, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
L EngelSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
J A LowthianBolton Clarke Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There is wide acknowledgement in the literature that social connection is protective against loneliness and depression. More robust research, however, is needed to evaluate interventions that promote social connection. This protocol paper outlines the evaluation of a community-wide social connection program, Methods: A Type 1 Hybrid design, including program effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and implementation evaluation of the Discussion: This study will provide a better understanding of the impacts of a community-wide social connection approach in older adults, the community and broader system. Clinical trial registration: https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=385192; Identifier ACTRN12623000968673.

Indexed as

DepressionLonelinessQuality of LifeSocial IsolationAgedAged, 80 and overAustraliaCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHealth PromotionHumansMaleProgram EvaluationSocial Supportcommunityearly interventionevaluationlonelinessolder adultspreventionprotocolsocial isolation

Identifiers

PMID38846622
PMCPMC11155451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.