Comparing Cognitive Profiles in Older Adults With Multiple Sclerosis and Alzheimer Disease: More Similarities Than Differences.

Background and Objectives: Up to 65% of people with multiple sclerosis (MS) experience disease-related cognitive impairment, but even after decades of research, still very little is known about the cognitive issues among older adults with MS (EwMS; individuals aged 60+). To date, few studies have attempted to characterize cognitive impairment in this group or compare EwMS with those with other neurodegenerative diseases. Our goal was to address this knowledge gap by comparing EwMS with individuals experiencing cognitive impairment due to probable Alzheimer disease (AD) with biomarker confirmation. Methods: We conducted an observational study of individuals seen for routine clinical care at the Cleveland Clinic. After excluding for potential confounding factors, 6 groups were assembled based on the results of their clinical workup and neuropsychological examination: cognitively normal, cognitively normal with MS, mild neurocognitive disorder (due to MS or AD), and major neurocognitive disorder (due to MS or AD). These groups were compared in terms of cognitive test performance, percentage of the group impaired on specific cognitive skills, and rates of cognitive impairment. Results: The sample comprised 140 individuals (64 EwMS and 76 demographically matched individuals from a memory clinic). Among those with mild neurocognitive disorder, differences between MS and AD were marked. However, in those with major neurocognitive disorder, these differences largely disappeared, except persistent performance differences on a measure of rote verbal memory. EwMS outperformed those with AD on memory tests at each level of cognitive impairment. EwMS also exhibited both subcortical and cortical deficits, rather than solely subcortical deficits. Discussion: The overall characterization of the cognitive profile of MS may be different than once described, involving both classically cortical and subcortical functions. Clinically, our results suggest that distinguishing between the cognitive effects of MS and AD at more severe levels of cognitive impairment may be less reliable than once thought. Future work to replicate these findings in other samples and deepen the understanding of cognition in older individuals with MS is needed.