ArticleClinical kidney journal2024
Towards a better uptake of home dialysis in Europe: understanding the present and looking to the future.
Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07364292 (Shared Decision Making in Dialysis Modality Selection), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Shared Decision Making in Dialysis Modality Selection: a Lived Experience From Nephrologists. A Nationwide Qualitative Study.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Incidence and prevalence of kidney replacement therapy in Central and Eastern Europe-trends from the ERA Registry.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2026Article
- Factors influencing home dialysis choice in Scandinavia: a cross-sectional study.BMC nephrology · 2026Article
- Patient-operated imaging for clinical assessment: regulatory and reimbursement challenges in European health systems.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
- Illness perception mediates the association between emotional intelligence and symptom distress among patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis: a Common-Sense Model approach.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- The Cost-Effectiveness of Initiating Patients on Home Dialysis Compared with In-Centre Haemodialysis.Applied health economics and health policy · 2025Article
- Kidney replacement therapies in the older person: challenges to decide the best option.Clinical kidney journal · 2025Review
- Population-level barriers to home hemodialysis implementation: a public health systems analysis of adoption readiness, health equity, and policy implications in China.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Home dialysis: advantages and limitations.Clinical kidney journal · 2024Article
- Declaration of Santo Domingo: commitment to improve education, regulations, public policies, and access to peritoneal dialysis in Latin America.Jornal brasileiro de nefrologiaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Use of peritoneal dialysis and home haemodialysis remains low in Europe, with the highest use in Scandinavian countries and the lowest in Eastern and Central Europe despite the advantages for people on dialysis and economic advantages for healthcare systems. This is partly due to the impact of the haemodialysis industry resulting in proliferation of haemodialysis units and nephrologist reimbursement related to use of haemodialysis. Equally important is the bias against home dialysis at both clinician and healthcare system levels. The underlying causes of this bias are discussed in relation to a mechanistic view of the human body, lack of compassion, failure to adjust dialysis provision for older age and frailty, proliferation of small dialysis centres, and complexity of decision-making and clinical care. For home dialysis to flourish, we need to foster a change in attitude to and vision of the aims of healthcare so that enabling meaningful activities of people requiring dialysis, as explored in the Standardized Outcomes in Nephrology initiative, rather than achieving biological numbers become the focus of care delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.