Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38846331›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2024

Research gaps in the neurodevelopmental assessment of children with complex congenital heart defects: a scoping review.

Johannes Hofer, Marina Blum, Regina Wiltsche, Nikoletta Deluggi, Daniel Holzinger, Johannes Fellinger, Gerald Tulzer, Gina Blum, Raphael Oberhuber

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Johannes HoferResearch Institute for Developmental Medicine, Johannes Kepler University of Linz, Linz, Austria.
Marina BlumResearch Institute for Developmental Medicine, Johannes Kepler University of Linz, Linz, Austria.
Regina WiltscheResearch Institute for Developmental Medicine, Johannes Kepler University of Linz, Linz, Austria.
Nikoletta DeluggiResearch Institute for Developmental Medicine, Johannes Kepler University of Linz, Linz, Austria.
Daniel HolzingerResearch Institute for Developmental Medicine, Johannes Kepler University of Linz, Linz, Austria.
Johannes FellingerResearch Institute for Developmental Medicine, Johannes Kepler University of Linz, Linz, Austria.
Gerald TulzerDepartment of Pediatric Cardiology, Children's Heart Center Linz, Kepler University Hospital, Linz, Austria.
Gina BlumResearch Institute for Developmental Medicine, Johannes Kepler University of Linz, Linz, Austria.
Raphael OberhuberResearch Institute for Developmental Medicine, Johannes Kepler University of Linz, Linz, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Children with congenital heart defects (CHD) are at risk for a range of developmental disabilities that challenge cognition, executive functioning, self-regulation, communication, social-emotional functioning, and motor skills. Ongoing developmental surveillance is therefore key to maximizing neurodevelopmental outcome opportunities. It is crucial that the measures used cover the spectrum of neurodevelopmental domains relevant to capturing possible predictors and malleable factors of child development. Objectives: This work aimed to synthesize the literature on neurodevelopmental measures and the corresponding developmental domains assessed in children aged 1-8 years with complex CHD. Methods: PubMed was searched for terms relating to psycho-social, cognitive and linguistic-communicative outcomes in children with CHD. 1,380 papers with a focus on complex CHD that reported neurodevelopmental assessments were identified; ultimately, data from 78 articles that used standardized neurodevelopmental assessment tools were extracted. Results: Thirty-nine (50%) of these excluded children with syndromes, and 9 (12%) excluded children with disorders of intellectual development. 10% of the studies were longitudinal. The neurodevelopmental domains addressed by the methods used were: 53% cognition, 16% psychosocial functioning, 18% language/communication/speech production, and 13% motor development-associated constructs. Conclusions: Data on social communication, expressive and receptive language, speech motor, and motor function are underrepresented. There is a lack of research into everyday use of language and into measures assessing language and communication early in life. Overall, longitudinal studies are required that include communication measures and their interrelations with other developmental domains.

Indexed as

assessmentcomplex congenital heart defects (CHD)malleable predictorsneurodevelopmentsocial communicationspeech motor

Identifiers

PMID38846331
PMCPMC11155449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.