ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2024
Deep learning-based automated scan plane positioning for brain magnetic resonance imaging.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Benchmarking Multimodal Vision Frontier Models With Lumbar Spine MRIs for Grading Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.Global spine journal · 2026Article
- Automated Field of View Prescription for Whole-body Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using Deep Learning Based Body Region Segmentations.Investigative radiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Manual planning of scans in clinical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) exhibits poor accuracy, lacks consistency, and is time-consuming. Meanwhile, classical automated scan plane positioning methods that rely on certain assumptions are not accurate or stable enough, and are computationally inefficient for practical application scenarios. This study aims to develop and evaluate an effective, reliable, and accurate deep learning-based framework that incorporates prior physical knowledge for automatic head scan plane positioning in MRI. Methods: A deep learning-based end-to-end automated scan plane positioning framework has been developed for MRI head scans. Our model takes a three-dimensional (3D) pre-scan image input, utilizing a cascaded 3D convolutional neural network to detect anatomical landmarks from coarse to fine. And then, with the determined landmarks, accurate scan plane localization can be achieved. A multi-scale spatial information fusion module was employed to aggregate high- and low-resolution features, combined with physically meaningful point regression loss (PRL) function and direction regression loss (DRL) function. Meanwhile, we simulate complex clinical scenarios to design data augmentation strategies. Results: Our proposed approach shows good performance on a clinically wide range of 229 MRI head scans, with a point-to-point absolute error (PAE) of 0.872 mm, a point-to-point relative error (PRE) of 0.10%, and an average angular error (AAE) of 0.502°, 0.381°, and 0.675° for the sagittal, transverse, and coronal planes, respectively. Conclusions: The proposed deep learning-based automated scan plane positioning shows high efficiency, accuracy and robustness when evaluated on varied clinical head MRI scans with differences in positioning, contrast, noise levels and pathologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.