Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38846292›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2024

Development and validation of an interpretable delta radiomics-based model for predicting invasive ground-glass nodules in lung adenocarcinoma: a retrospective cohort study.

Tingjia Xue, Lin Zhu, Yali Tao, Xiaodan Ye, Hong Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tingjia Xue *Department of Radiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7254-9449
Lin Zhu *Department of Radiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0322-9321
Yali Tao *School of Health Science and Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China.
Xiaodan YeDepartment of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1094-4334
Hong YuDepartment of Radiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3059-2740

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Radiomics models based on computed tomography (CT) can be used to differentiate invasive ground-glass nodules (GGNs) in lung adenocarcinoma to help determine the optimal timing of GGN resection, improve the accuracy of prognostic prediction, and reduce unnecessary surgeries. However, general radiomics does not fully utilize follow-up data and often lacks model interpretation. Therefore, this study aimed to build an interpretable model based on delta radiomics to predict GGN invasiveness. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on a set of 303 GGNs that were surgically resected and confirmed as lung adenocarcinoma in Shanghai Chest Hospital between September 2017 and August 2022. Delta radiomics and general radiomics features were extracted from preoperative follow-up CT scans and combined with clinical features for modeling. The performance of the delta radiomics-clinical model was compared to that of the radiomics-clinical model. Additionally, Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) was employed to interpret and visualize the model. Results: Two models were constructed using a combination of 34 radiomic features and 10 delta radiomic features, along with 14 clinical features. The radiomics-clinical model and the delta radiomics-clinical model exhibited area under the curve (AUC) of 0.986 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.977-0.995] and 0.974 (95% CI: 0.959-0.987) in the training set, respectively, and 0.949 (95% CI: 0.908-0.978) and 0.927 (95% CI: 0.879-0.966) in the test set, respectively. The DeLong test of the two models showed no statistical significance (P=0.10) in the test set. SHAP was used to output a summary plot for global interpretation, which showed that preoperative mass, three-dimensional (3D) length, mean diameter, volume, mean CT value, and delta radiomics feature original_firstorder_RootMeanSquared were the relatively more important features in the model. Waterfall plots for local interpretation showed how each feature contributed to the prediction output of a given GGN. Conclusions: The delta radiomics-based model proved to be a helpful tool for predicting the invasiveness of GGNs in lung adenocarcinoma. This approach offers a precise, noninvasive alternative in informing clinical decision-making. Additionally, SHAP provided insightful and user-friendly interpretations and visualizations of the model, enhancing its clinical applicability.

Indexed as

Delta radiomicsground-glass nodule (GGN)lung adenocarcinomaShapley additive explanations (SHAP)

Identifiers

PMID38846292
PMCPMC11151254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.