ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2024
Development and validation of an interpretable delta radiomics-based model for predicting invasive ground-glass nodules in lung adenocarcinoma: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnosing breast masses in BI-RADS 4: construction and interpretation of an intralesional and perilesional radiomics nomogram based on digital breast tomosynthesis.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- CT-based interpretable delta-radiomics model for risk stratification of pulmonary ground-glass nodules: a multicentre study.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- Machine learning models based on tumoral, 4 mm-peritumoral, and combined radiomic features for evaluating the invasiveness of lung adenocarcinoma manifesting as ground-glass nodules.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Super-resolution and habitat radiomics based computed tomography machine-learning model for prediction of lung invasive adenocarcinoma: a multi-centre study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Prediction of lymphovascular invasion in invasive breast cancer via intratumoral and peritumoral multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging machine learning-based radiomics with Shapley additive explanations interpretability analysis.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Predicting the invasiveness of ground-glass opacity predominant lung adenocarcinoma with clinical stage Ia: a CT-based semantic and radiomics analysis.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Radiomics models based on computed tomography (CT) can be used to differentiate invasive ground-glass nodules (GGNs) in lung adenocarcinoma to help determine the optimal timing of GGN resection, improve the accuracy of prognostic prediction, and reduce unnecessary surgeries. However, general radiomics does not fully utilize follow-up data and often lacks model interpretation. Therefore, this study aimed to build an interpretable model based on delta radiomics to predict GGN invasiveness. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on a set of 303 GGNs that were surgically resected and confirmed as lung adenocarcinoma in Shanghai Chest Hospital between September 2017 and August 2022. Delta radiomics and general radiomics features were extracted from preoperative follow-up CT scans and combined with clinical features for modeling. The performance of the delta radiomics-clinical model was compared to that of the radiomics-clinical model. Additionally, Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) was employed to interpret and visualize the model. Results: Two models were constructed using a combination of 34 radiomic features and 10 delta radiomic features, along with 14 clinical features. The radiomics-clinical model and the delta radiomics-clinical model exhibited area under the curve (AUC) of 0.986 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.977-0.995] and 0.974 (95% CI: 0.959-0.987) in the training set, respectively, and 0.949 (95% CI: 0.908-0.978) and 0.927 (95% CI: 0.879-0.966) in the test set, respectively. The DeLong test of the two models showed no statistical significance (P=0.10) in the test set. SHAP was used to output a summary plot for global interpretation, which showed that preoperative mass, three-dimensional (3D) length, mean diameter, volume, mean CT value, and delta radiomics feature original_firstorder_RootMeanSquared were the relatively more important features in the model. Waterfall plots for local interpretation showed how each feature contributed to the prediction output of a given GGN. Conclusions: The delta radiomics-based model proved to be a helpful tool for predicting the invasiveness of GGNs in lung adenocarcinoma. This approach offers a precise, noninvasive alternative in informing clinical decision-making. Additionally, SHAP provided insightful and user-friendly interpretations and visualizations of the model, enhancing its clinical applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.