Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38846253›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Peer Assessment of Student Presentations: Key Takeaways and Lessons Learned.

Gitanjali Khorwal, Raviprakash Meshram, Vikas Vaibhav, Rahul Sharma, Brijendra Singh, Salu Chandran, Kshitiza Sharma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gitanjali KhorwalAnatomy, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Rishikesh, IND.
Raviprakash MeshramForensic Medicine and Toxicology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Rishikesh, IND.
Vikas VaibhavForensic Medicine and Toxicology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Rishikesh, IND.
Rahul SharmaAnatomy, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Rishikesh, IND.
Brijendra SinghAnatomy, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Rishikesh, IND.
Salu ChandranForensic Medicine and Toxicology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Rishikesh, IND.
Kshitiza SharmaMental Health Nursing, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, Patna, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Students' presentations are a teaching-learning tool where students not only study and understand a topic but also teach their peers, thereby learning the art and skill of effective presentation. Aims The study aimed to evaluate peer assessments in students' presentations and find their role and application in improving presentation skills among students through feedback and course correction. Methods A group of students every week from a class of 125 was assigned a topic to present to the rest of their batch students who evaluated their presentation on a rubric shared via a Google Form link. The number of students who gave responses was noted. The responses were also shared with the presenters. The evaluator faculty moderated and discussed the areas for possible improvement and course correction. The students also filled out a feedback form on the entire exercise after presentations from the entire batch. Results The quality of students' presentation skills improved with subsequent students over the period. The students learned about their areas of improvement. Through the feedback form, students shared their reasons not to give a presentation. However, most of them found the exercise beneficial. Conclusions Peer assessment can be a credible mode for improving presentation skills with the active participation of other students and provide a learning method based on others' performances. Peer responses provide for self-evaluation and self-reflection. This type of survey among different institutions will identify students' flaws, help them improve and self-evaluate, and add to the current literature.

Indexed as

anatomyassessmentfeedbackpedagogyrubricstudents’ presentation

Identifiers

PMID38846253
PMCPMC11154023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.