ArticleCureus2024
Comparison of Swiss LithoClast Trilogy™ and Pneumatic Swiss LithoClast™ in Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Terms of Stone Free Rate and Complications: A Single-Center Experience From a Stone Belt Country.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Renal calculi therapy has advanced significantly in recent years, with mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) emerging as a minimally invasive treatment modality. Mini-PCNL has been subjected to several modifications to achieve the best possible outcomes and reduce morbidity. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of Swiss LithoClast Trilogy™ and pneumatic Swiss LithoClast™ in managing renal stones with mini-PCNL. Methodology This descriptive retrospective study was conducted at the Department of Urology, Lady Reading Hospital, from January 1, 2023, to December 31, 2023. A record of male and female patients aged more than 18 years who underwent mini-PCNL for renal stones was retrieved. The following two groups of patients were created: group A (n = 25) mini-PCNL with Swiss LithoClast Trilogy™ and group B (n = 26) mini-PCNL with pneumatic Swiss LithoClast™. The efficacy and safety profile of both groups was compared. Results A total of 51 patients were enrolled, with 25 in group A and 26 in group B. Groups A and B had mean ages of 45.2 and 47.5 years, respectively. Male participants outnumbered females in both groups, 72% (n = 18) in group A and 77% (n = 20) in group B. Group A had a mean stone size of 15.8 mm, and group B had a mean stone size of 16.5 mm. Stone-free rate on postoperative day one was 88% (n = 22) in group A and 84.6% (n = 22) in group B, with no statistically significant difference (p > 0.05). At the end of three months, 96% of participants in group A and 84.6% of patients in group B were found to be free of stones, and the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Intraoperative hemorrhage occurred in 12% (n = 3) of group A and 15.4% (n = 4) of group B patients, with no significant difference (p > 0.05). Conclusions There were no significant differences in stone-free rates, complication rates, or intraoperative/postoperative complications between mini-PCNL with Swiss LithoClast Trilogy™ or Pneumatic Swiss LithoClast™.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.