ArticleCureus2024
The Assessment of Nutritional Status of Adolescents Aged 15-18 Years Using BMI Cutoffs and BMI Z Scores: A Secondary Analysis of National Family Health Survey-5 (2019-21) Data.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of a Smart Health Care Service Using Metaverse and Chatbot Technologies for Adolescents, Parents, and School Health Teachers: User-Centered Design Approach.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Level of medication non-adherence among ambulatory patients with dyslipidemia and comorbid illness in Northwest Ethiopia: a multicenter cross-sectional study.Therapeutic advances in chronic disease · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAppropriate assessment of nutritional status of adolescents as a population group is an important area of focus, considering the age of culminating growth, the size of the age group, the changing nutrition patterns, and as a window of opportunity for corrections before adulthood sets in. Nutritional status is now recognized to be a prime indicator of the health of individuals. The World Health Organization (WHO) emphasizes the importance of employing age- and sex-specific reference values (body mass index-for-age Z scores {BAZ} scores) for nutritional assessment in this age group. However, the National Family Health Survey (NFHS), the major source of data in India for the policymakers, reports the nutritional status of adolescents based on adult body mass index (BMI) cutoffs, which might not be as appropriate as compared to body mass index-for-age Z scores (BAZ) scores. Misclassification of nutrition status has impacts on public health policies, intervention programs, and long-term health outcomes for adolescents.
methodsThis secondary analysis of NFHS-5 data was performed with the objective of estimating the degree of agreement between BMI and BAZ cutoffs in classifying the nutritional status among Indian adolescents. The NFHS-5 data were collected from over 636,000 households across the country. Height and weight were measured for adolescents using standardized instruments. BMI and BAZ scores were derived to assess nutritional status. World Health Organization's classifications were used to categorize nutritional status based on BMI and BAZ scores. The final analysis included data from 109,340 adolescents (13,040 males and 96,300 females) after excluding subjects having BAZ outliers and those whose age was 179 months or less.
resultsSubstantial discrepancies emerged between the two methods. BMI classifications underestimated nutritional status in almost 30% of adolescents compared to BAZ. Over one-third of normal-weight individuals by BAZ are classified as thin by BMI. Conversely, nearly 78% of obese adolescents by BMI are classified as overweight by BAZ. The agreements between the classifications improved with age and were better among males.
conclusionThis analysis highlights the limitations of BMI for assessing adolescent nutritional status and suggests that BAZ offers a more accurate and age-appropriate alternative.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.