ArticleCureus2024
Assessment of Arabic Web-Based Knowledge About Root Canal Treatment: An Infodemiologic Study.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRoot canal treatment (RCT) is a vital dental procedure aimed at preserving tooth function and minimizing infection. Access to accurate and comprehensive information about RCT is crucial for informed decision-making. With the increasing reliance on the Internet for health-related information, it is essential to evaluate the quality and readability of web-based RCT content, particularly in Arabic-speaking regions.
methodsThis study conducted an extensive web search using three major search engines (Google, Yahoo, and Bing) to identify Arabic-language websites providing information on RCT. Inclusion criteria required websites in Arabic with comprehensive RCT content. Quality assessment employed the DISCERN instrument, JAMA benchmarks, and Health on the Net (HON) assessment tools, while readability was assessed using Flesch Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG), and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) metrics.
resultsOut of 152 websites included, the majority were affiliated with university/medical centers (56.58%) and non-profit organizations (28.29%). Quality assessment revealed that the mean DISCERN score was 2.82, indicating moderate quality. Only one website achieved a high DISCERN score. JAMA benchmarks showed limited compliance, with only two websites meeting all criteria. The HON code was found on only five websites. Readability analysis indicated that most websites were reasonably easy to read by the general population.
conclusionThis study highlights the significant gap in the quality and reliability of web-based health information related to RCT in Arabic. While the majority of websites examined in this study did not meet established quality standards, there is a clear need for improvements in the accuracy and comprehensiveness of online resources. Patients seeking information on RCT should exercise caution and consider consulting healthcare professionals for trustworthy guidance. Further research should explore strategies to enhance the quality of web-based health information and expand the scope of evaluation to ensure that individuals have access to reliable resources for making informed decisions about their dental health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.