ArticleMedecine tropicale et sante internationale2024
[Ocular burns: epidemiological, clinical, therapeutic and evolutionary aspects at the Cocody University Hospital, Côte d'Ivoire].
Article in Medecine tropicale et sante internationale, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Seeing the unseen: The low treatment rate of eye emergencies in Africa.World journal of methodology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Justification: This study describes the socio-demographic characteristics, clinical, therapeutic, and evolutionary aspects of ocular burns to contribute to the improvement of their management. Method: A retrospective study was conducted in the Ophthalmology Department of the Cocody University Hospital (CHU) in Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire, from January 1, 2020, to January 31, 2021. It focused on 49 patient records with ocular trauma, including 12 bilateral cases, totaling 61 eyes. For each patient, socio-demographic data, the nature of the traumatic agent, burn etiologies, ocular burn stage, initial and final uncorrected visual acuity of the affected eye, and treatment were collected. Results: The proportion of ocular burns was 11% out of 436 cases of ocular trauma that consulted in the department. The average age of patients was 27.9 years ± 14.2, ranging from 3 to 60 years, with a male predominance (70%). Students were the most frequent socio-professional category (39%). Work-related accidents were the predominant circumstances, in a third of cases. Chemical agents were the main traumatic agents, in 54% of cases. The average consultation time was 3.5 days ± 7.9, ranging from 1 to 60 days. Stage 1 of the Roper-Hall classification was the most observed stage (51% of cases). Initial visual acuity of the affected eye was less than 1/20 in 28% of cases. Treatment was mainly medical, and a third of treated eyes had a final acuity less than 1/20. Conclusion: Visual prognosis is influenced by burn stages, etiologies, and consultation time, varying according to social and geographical origins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.