Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38846113›Full record

ArticleMedecine tropicale et sante internationale2024

[Sickle cell disease in French Guiana: assessing 30 years of neonatal screening (1992-2021)].

Narcisse Elenga, Vathanaksambath Ro, Joddy Mafema Missindu, Noelis Thomas Boizan, Tania Vaz, Aude Lucarelli, Marie Élise Armoudon-Fleret, Solange Buendé

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Medecine tropicale et sante internationale, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Narcisse ElengaService de médecine et chirurgie pédiatrique, Centre hospitalier de Cayenne, Cayenne, Guyane.
Vathanaksambath RoService de médecine et chirurgie pédiatrique, Centre hospitalier de Cayenne, Cayenne, Guyane.
Joddy Mafema MissinduCentre intégré de drépanocytose, Centre hospitalier de Cayenne, Cayenne, Guyane.
Noelis Thomas BoizanCentre intégré de drépanocytose, Centre hospitalier de Cayenne, Cayenne, Guyane.
Tania VazCentre intégré de drépanocytose, Centre hospitalier de Cayenne, Cayenne, Guyane.
Aude LucarelliCentre intégré de drépanocytose, Centre hospitalier de Cayenne, Cayenne, Guyane.
Marie Élise Armoudon-FleretAssociation Drépaguyane, Cayenne, Guyane.
Solange BuendéService de néonatologie, Centre hospitalier de l'Ouest guyanais Franck Joly, Saint-Laurent-du-Maroni, Guyane.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Sickle cell disease is one of the most common genetic diseases in France. In French Guiana, neonatal screening was introduced in 1992, at the same time as other screening programs for childhood diseases. The aim of this study is to describe the organization of newborn screening for sickle cell disease in French Guiana. Materials and methods: We used several data sources: data collected from hospital records since 2005, activity reports from the national neonatal screening program and data from screening campaigns organized by the Drepaguyane association between 2010 and 2021 on 1,300 subjects. Blood samples from newborns are collected by capillary or venous sampling and absorbed on blotting paper (Guthrie) at the same time as those for other neonatal screenings. The dried papers are sent to the inter-regional laboratory in Lille, for further processing. In Saint-Laurent-du-Maroni, in order to reduce the proportion of people lost to follow-up, a double screening is carried out and the results are returned before discharge from the maternity hospital. All data were entered into an anonymous Excel file. The data were analyzed using STATA software. Results: Among the 175,593 screened neonates between 1992 and 2021, screening detected 823 infants with sickle cell disease and 17,950 heterozygotes. Sickle cell genotypes include 493 SS (60%), 302 SC (37%) and 28 S-Beta-thalassemia (3%). The incidence of sickle cell disease was 1/213, 95% CI [1/236-1/204], and that of heterozygotes 1/10, IC 95% [1/12-1/8]. The majority of these children (52%) were from the Maroni region. The delay between screening and test results was 7 days. Only pathological results (homozygous, heterozygous) were communicated to parents and/or the attending physician by post. These data confirm the upward trend in the number of children screened for sickle cell disease in French Guiana. Data from screening campaigns organized by the Drepaguyane association have enabled to describe the distribution of the various abnormal hemoglobin fractions, and to confirm that HbS is more frequent in Western French Guiana. In Cayenne, in 2021, the active file comprised 699 patients, including 266 children under 18 years old. Discussion and conclusion: This study provides valuable data on 30 years of neonatal screening for sickle cell disease in French Guiana, and on the evolution of sickle cell disease patients. It confirms that French Guiana is the French territory with the highest incidence of sickle cell disease. This incidence continues to rise over time. The study reveals the improvement in the organization of sickle cell disease management in French Guiana between 1992, when screening was introduced, and the present day. It highlights the role of patient associations in the fight against this disease, by organizing awareness and screening campaigns. These data will be used to guide public health policies in the pursuit of improved care and primary prevention.

Indexed as

Anemia, Sickle CellNeonatal ScreeningFemaleFrench GuianaHumansInfant, NewbornTime FactorsFrench GuianaIncidenceNeonatal screeningSickle cell diseaseSouth America

Identifiers

PMID38846113
PMCPMC11151905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.