Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38846108›Full record

ArticlePublic health in practice (Oxford, England)2024

Developing the embedded researcher role: Learning from the first year of the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR), Health Determinants Research Collaboration (HDRC), Doncaster, UK.

E Holding, R Gettings, A Foster, L Dowrick, S Hampshaw, A Haywood, C Homer, A Booth, E Goyder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health in practice (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

E HoldingSheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (ScHARR), Division of Population Health, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, University of Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
R GettingsAdvanced Well-being Research Centre (AWRC), Sheffield Hallam University, Olympic Legacy Park, 2 Old Hall Road, Sheffield, S9 3TU, UK.
A FosterSheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (ScHARR), Division of Population Health, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, University of Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
L DowrickAdvanced Well-being Research Centre (AWRC), Sheffield Hallam University, Olympic Legacy Park, 2 Old Hall Road, Sheffield, S9 3TU, UK.
S HampshawCity of Doncaster Council, Doncaster, UK.
A HaywoodSheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (ScHARR), Division of Population Health, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, University of Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
C HomerAdvanced Well-being Research Centre (AWRC), Sheffield Hallam University, Olympic Legacy Park, 2 Old Hall Road, Sheffield, S9 3TU, UK.
A BoothSheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (ScHARR), Division of Population Health, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, University of Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
E GoyderSheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (ScHARR), Division of Population Health, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, University of Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Strategies to embed research knowledge into decision making contexts include the Embedded Research (ER) model, which involves the collocation of academic researchers in non-academic organisations such as hospitals and local authorities. A local authority in Doncaster, United Kingdom (UK) has adopted an embedded researcher model within the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR), Health Determinants Research Collaboration (HDRC). This five-year collaboration enables universities and local authorities to work together to reduce health inequalities and target the social determinants of health. Building on previous embedded research models, this approach is unique due to its significant scale and long-term investment. In this opinion paper Embedded Researchers (ERs) reflect on their experiences of the first year of the collaboration. Study design: A reflective consultation exercise. Methods: Observation of HDRC delivery meetings, as well as informal discussions and a short proforma with ERs (N = 8). Results: ERs valued the five-year timeframe which provided a unique opportunity for strengthened relationships and to apply formative learning as the programme progressed. However, differences in knowledge of undertaking research across the HDRC team and between practitioners and academics require each to respect different professional experiences and to avoid potential power imbalances. Diverse projects required researchers to be generalists, applying their expertise to multiple topics. This requires careful priority setting alongside workload and expectation management. Conclusions: The significant scale and investment of the HDRC provides a unique opportunity for developing the ER role by applying formative learning as the programme progresses. However, success will require careful management of workload allocation and relationships between ERs and practitioners. Further learning on how to embed ERs within local authority contexts will emerge as the programme matures.

Indexed as

Embedded researchHealth determinants research collaborationsLocal government

Identifiers

PMID38846108
PMCPMC11153224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.