Mortality prediction and influencing factors for intensive care unit patients with acute tubular necrosis: random survival forest and cox regression analysis.

Jinping Zeng, Min Zhang, Jiaolan Du, Junde Han, Qin Song, Ting Duan, Jun Yang, Yinyin Wu

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

3citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

Chloremia Disturbances in Critical Care: A Narrative Review of Pathophysiology, Clinical Impact and Management Strategies.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
Review
Clinical significance of CD45 and CD200 expression in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2025
Article
Interpretable machine learning for predicting cardiovascular-specific survival in breast cancer patients with second primary cancers: A SEER-based study.Digital health
Article

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jinping Zeng *Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China.

Min Zhang *Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China.

Jiaolan DuDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China.

Junde HanDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China.

Qin SongDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China.

Ting DuanResearch on Accurate Diagnosis and Treatment of Tumor, School of Pharmacy, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China.

Jun Yang *Department of Nutrition and Toxicology, School of Public Health, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China.

Yinyin Wu *Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

acute tubular necrosiscox regressionnomogramrandom survival forestrisk factors

Identifiers

PMID38846097

DOI10.3389/fphar.2024.1361923

PMCPMC11153709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.