ReviewRSC chemical biology2024
Advances in the joint profiling technologies of 5mC and 5hmC.
Review in RSC chemical biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Epigenetic blind spots - the role of DNA methylation dynamics in stem cell-based models of embryogenesis.FEBS letters · 2026Article
- Simultaneous single-base resolution profiling of 5mC and 5hmC using BRIGHT-seq.National science review · 2026Article
- The potential of methylation signal detection in eDNA toward functional ecological monitoring.Communications biology · 2026Review
- HM-DyadCap - capture and mapping of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine/5-methylcytosine CpG dyads in mammalian DNA.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- 5mC and 5hmC methylation sequencing: the power of 6-base sequencing in a multiomic era.Epigenomics · 2026Review
- KnowYourCG: Facilitating base-level sparse methylome interpretation.Science advances · 2025Article
- Cell identity and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine.Epigenetics & chromatin · 2025Review
- Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
DNA cytosine methylation, a crucial epigenetic modification, involves the dynamic interplay of 5-methylcytosine (5mC) and its oxidized form, 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC), generated by ten-eleven translocation (TET) DNA dioxygenases. This process is central to regulating gene expression, influencing critical biological processes such as development, disease progression, and aging. Recognizing the distinct functions of 5mC and 5hmC, researchers often employ restriction enzyme-based or chemical treatment methods for their simultaneous measurement from the same genomic sample. This enables a detailed understanding of the relationship between these modifications and their collective impact on cellular function. This review focuses on summarizing the technologies for detecting 5mC and 5hmC together but also discusses the limitations and potential future directions in this evolving field.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.