ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology case reports2024
The impact of removing the epiretinal membrane and inner limiting membrane for sustained subretinal fluid by macular neovascularization refractory to anti-VEGF therapy.
Article in American journal of ophthalmology case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy is the most prevalent intervention for exudative lesions secondary to neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and other macular neovascularization (MNV). However, in some cases refractory to the latest anti-VEGF agents is associated with epiretinal membrane (ERM) or vitreomacular traction. We applied a vitrectomy to remove those pathologies which may be effective for reducing the exudation. Observations: In this case report, we present 2 cases with sustained subretinal fluid and macular neovascularization secondary to nAMD or dome-shaped macula that poorly responded to anti-VEGF therapy. In both cases, removing thin ERM or vitreomacular traction with an inner limiting membrane peeling promptly resolved the subretinal fluid and no recurrence was observed thereafter. Conclusions and importance: Vitrectomy could be an effective modality for anti-VEGF drug-resistant MNV cases with vitreomacular traction or ERM even in the anti-VEGF era.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.