ArticleHeliyon2024
Label-free white blood cells classification using a deep feature fusion neural network.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- OsteoNet: A deep learning framework linking cellular morphology to molecular markers for quantifying osteogenic differentiation.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- Unstained Blood Smear Analysis: A Review of Rule-Based, Machine Learning, and Deep Learning Techniques.Journal of biophotonics · 2025Review
- Toward Digital Periodontal Health: Recent Advances and Future Perspectives.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
White blood cell (WBC) classification is a valuable diagnostic approach for identifying diseases. However, conventional methods for WBC detection, such as flow cytometers, have limitations in terms of their high cost, large system size, and laborious staining procedures. As a result, deep learning-based label-free WBC image analysis methods are gaining popularity. Nevertheless, most existing deep learning WBC classification techniques fail to effectively utilize the subtle differences in the internal structures of WBCs observed under a microscope. To address this issue, we propose a neural network with feature fusion in this study, which enables the detection of label-free WBCs. Unlike conventional convolutional neural networks (CNNs), our approach combines low-level features extracted by shallow layers with high-level features extracted by deep layers, generating fused features for accurate bright-field WBC identification. Our method achieves an accuracy of 80.3 % on the testing set, demonstrating a potential solution for deep-learning-based biomedical diagnoses. Considering the proposed method simplifies the cell detection process and eliminates the need for complex operations like fluorescent staining, we anticipate that this automatic and label-free WBC classification network could facilitate more precise and effective analysis, and it could contribute to the future adoption of miniatured flow cytometers for point-of-care (POC) diagnostics applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.