ArticleHeliyon2024
Nontuberculous mycobacterial disease in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- A smear test aiding with an automated slide reader acquires equivalent sensitivity to MGIT960 culture in pulmonary tuberculosis diagnosis.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Nontuberculous Mycobacteria Infections in Children: A Clinical Overview of Diagnosis and Management.Microorganisms · 2026Review
- Temporal trends, diagnostics, and outcomes of pediatric nontuberculous mycobacterial disease in Slovakia (2017-2024).Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Host susceptibility spectrum and diagnostic challenges in pediatric nontuberculous mycobacterial disease: a case series of five patients with literature review.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Analysis of nontuberculous mycobacterial infections in Saudi children from a tertiary care hospital perspective.Journal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2025Article
- Epidemiology and Drug Susceptibility of Nontuberculous Mycobacteria in the Province of Pavia (Northern Italy): An Overview.Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Targeting Autophagy as a Strategy for Developing New Host-Directed Therapeutics Against Nontuberculous Mycobacteria.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- NGS-based approach for diagnostically unidentifiedFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The prevalence of nontuberculous mycobacterial (NTM) disease in children is increasing worldwide. The clinical manifestations of pediatric NTM patients are significantly different from those of adult patients, but the knowledge of the disease is generally poor. Methods: English databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, BIOSIS) and Chinese databases (CNKI, Wanfan, VIP) were searched on October 15th, 2022. All the articles of cross-sectional and cohort studies reporting the species composition and lesion site of the NTM disease in children using well-recognized NTM species identification methods were taken into account. Using a random effects model, we assessed the disease lesion sites and the prevalence of different NTM species in pediatric NTM disease. Sources of heterogeneity were analyzed using Cochran's Q and the I Results: The prevalence rates of NTM disease in children ranged between 0.6 and 5.36/100,000 in different countries, and Europe reported the highest prevalence rate. The most common clinical lesion site was lymph node, accounting for 71.1 % (55.0 %-83.2 %), followed by lung (19.3 %, 9.8%-34.4 %）and then skin and soft tissue (16.6 %,13.5%-20.3 %). Conclusions: The lymph node was the most affected organ in pediatric NTM disease, while
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.